ETF Overlap Checker
SCHDVYMdividend ETFETF overlap

SCHD vs VYM: Two Dividend ETFs That Barely Overlap

SCHD and VYM are treated as interchangeable dividend funds, but their weighted overlap is under 20% despite dozens of shared holdings. Here is what separates them.

By ETF Overlap Checker
Disclaimer: This content is not investment advice. Investing involves the risk of loss of principal. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always consult a qualified financial advisor before making investment decisions.

Ask which dividend ETF to hold and the answer usually comes back as "SCHD or VYM, they're basically the same." The data disagrees. The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF and the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF share 79 holdings yet register a weighted overlap of only 18.89% — a Low Overlap verdict on the live SCHD vs VYM comparison.

For two funds in the same category, that is remarkably little duplication. It also means the choice between them, or the decision to hold both, matters far more than the "basically the same" framing suggests.

Two Different Definitions of a Dividend Stock

The overlap is low because the funds screen for different things.

SCHD starts from the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, which requires at least ten consecutive years of dividend payments and then ranks candidates on fundamental quality — cash flow to debt, return on equity, dividend growth, and yield. It ends up with roughly 100 names selected for durability as much as payout.

VYM takes a broader approach: rank U.S. companies by forecast yield, take the higher-yielding half, exclude REITs, and cap-weight the result. That produces a portfolio several times larger, closer to a broad value slice of the market than a curated list.

One fund is a concentrated quality screen. The other is a wide yield screen. Overlapping tickers are inevitable; overlapping weight is not.

Concentration Is the Deciding Factor

The shared names are held at very different sizes, and that is where the overlap score drains away. On the live comparison, SCHD's stakes in its shared positions run several times larger than VYM's stakes in the same companies — SCHD concentrates roughly 4% of the portfolio into a single holding where VYM might allocate 1.5%.

Under the weighted formula, only the smaller of the two weights counts:

Overlap = Σ min(weight in SCHD, weight in VYM)

So a company held at 4.3% in SCHD and 1.5% in VYM contributes just 1.5%. The remaining 2.8% is SCHD-specific conviction with no counterpart. Multiply that across 79 shared names spread thinly across VYM's much larger portfolio, and the total lands under 20%.

What This Means for a Portfolio

Because the overlap is genuinely low, holding both is defensible in a way that most same-category pairings are not:

  • They are not redundant. A Low Overlap score means the second fund is adding exposure, not repeating the first.
  • They express different bets. SCHD is a concentrated wager on dividend quality and balance-sheet strength. VYM is a diversified tilt toward higher-yielding large caps.
  • Their risk profiles differ. Concentration cuts both ways — SCHD's top holdings drive more of its outcome, for better or worse.
  • Cost is close enough to be a tiebreaker, not a decision. Both sit at the low end of the expense spectrum.

The more common mistake is not owning both. It is owning one of them alongside a broad market fund and assuming the dividend sleeve is doing something distinct. Check that assumption: SCHD vs VTI is the pairing worth measuring.

Compare Against a Real Duplicate

For calibration, look at what high overlap actually looks like. VOO vs IVV scores 97.16% — same index, same weighting, almost complete duplication. Against that benchmark, SCHD and VYM are not close relatives at all.

How to Check Your Own Income Sleeve

  1. Run each pair of dividend or income funds you hold through the overlap checker.
  2. Read the weighted score rather than the shared-holdings count — 79 shared names sounds like heavy duplication and is not.
  3. Inspect the top shared holdings. If one fund's weights dwarf the other's, you are looking at two different strategies that happen to share tickers.

The methodology guide explains the scoring in detail, and how to reduce ETF portfolio overlap covers the portfolio-level cleanup.

Conclusion

SCHD and VYM share a label and little else: 79 common holdings, 18.89% common weight. Treating them as interchangeable misreads both funds.

Run your own income pair at ETF Overlap Checker — free, no account required.

← Back to Blog