DIA vs USMV Overlap
DIA is an industrials ETF from SPDR, while USMV is an equity ETF from IShares. DIA and USMV show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 17.85%. They share 20 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by MSFT, JNJ, and NVDA.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
DIA is an industrials ETF from SPDR, while USMV is an equity ETF from IShares. DIA and USMV show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 17.85%. They share 20 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by MSFT, JNJ, and NVDA.
- 17.85% weighted overlap across 20 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 25.34% of the measured overlap.
- USMV is the broader fund, while DIA is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- DIA holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- USMV holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 13, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
DIA is an industrials ETF from SPDR, while USMV is an equity ETF from IShares. DIA and USMV do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like MSFT, JNJ, and NVDA.
How They Differ
DIA is an industrials ETF from SPDR, while USMV is an equity ETF from IShares. USMV is the broader fund, while DIA is the more targeted sleeve. USMV has the lower expense ratio, while DIA charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 25.34% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, USMV is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, DIA is the narrower expression. USMV has the lower expense ratio, while DIA charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 25.34% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between DIA and USMV.
| Holding | Name | DIA Wt. | USMV Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT | MICROSOFT CORP | 5.23% | 1.53% | 1.53% |
| JNJ | JOHNSON + JOHNSON | 3.14% | 1.50% | 1.50% |
| NVDA | NVIDIA CORP | 2.38% | 1.50% | 1.50% |
| MCD | MCDONALD S CORP | 4.22% | 1.37% | 1.37% |
| MRK | MERCK + CO. INC. | 1.51% | 1.24% | 1.24% |
| IBM | INTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP | 3.22% | 1.19% | 1.19% |
| PG | PROCTER + GAMBLE CO/THE | 2.01% | 1.16% | 1.16% |
| TRV | TRAVELERS COS INC/THE | 3.90% | 1.07% | 1.07% |
| KO | COCA COLA CO/THE | 1.00% | 1.17% | 1.00% |
| CSCO | CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 1.00% | 1.51% | 1.00% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
DIA is an industrials ETF from SPDR, while USMV is an equity ETF from IShares. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are MSFT, JNJ, and NVDA, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both DIA and USMV can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About DIA and USMV
What is the overlap between DIA and USMV?+
How many holdings do DIA and USMV share?+
Is the DIA and USMV overlap high?+
Why do DIA and USMV overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, DIA or USMV?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.