HDV vs VWO Overlap
HDV is a dividend-focused equity ETF from IShares, while VWO is an emerging-markets equity ETF from Vanguard. HDV and VWO show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 0.25%. They share 4 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by KMB, PAG, and PEP.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
HDV is a dividend-focused equity ETF from IShares, while VWO is an emerging-markets equity ETF from Vanguard. HDV and VWO show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 0.25%. They share 4 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by KMB, PAG, and PEP.
- 0.25% weighted overlap across 4 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 98% of the measured overlap.
- HDV and VWO are closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche ETF pair.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- HDV holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- VWO holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 13, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
HDV is a dividend-focused equity ETF from IShares, while VWO is an emerging-markets equity ETF from Vanguard. HDV and VWO do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like KMB, PAG, and PEP.
How They Differ
HDV is a dividend-focused equity ETF from IShares, while VWO is an emerging-markets equity ETF from Vanguard. Neither fund clearly dominates on breadth, so the practical difference is more about weighting, index construction, and cost. VWO has the lower expense ratio, while HDV charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 98% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
Because HDV and VWO are closer in breadth, the better fit usually comes down to index methodology, issuer preference, and cost. VWO has the lower expense ratio, while HDV charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 98% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between HDV and VWO.
| Holding | Name | HDV Wt. | VWO Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMB | KIMBERLY CLARK CORP | 0.80% | 0.21% | 0.21% |
| PAG | PENSKE AUTOMOTIVE GROUP VOTING INC | 0.05% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| PEP | PEPSICO INC | 4.09% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| CMS | CMS ENERGY CORP | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
HDV is a dividend-focused equity ETF from IShares, while VWO is an emerging-markets equity ETF from Vanguard. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are KMB, PAG, and PEP, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both HDV and VWO can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About HDV and VWO
What is the overlap between HDV and VWO?+
How many holdings do HDV and VWO share?+
Is the HDV and VWO overlap high?+
Why do HDV and VWO overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, HDV or VWO?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.