IJR vs IWF Overlap

Both funds come from IShares. IJR is a small-cap U.S. equity ETF, while IWF is a U.S. growth equity ETF. IJR and IWF show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 0.09%. They share 14 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by ENPH, CORT, and RNG.

0.1% overlap
#
14Shared Holdings
OK
Low Overlap

Served from cache.

Quick Answer

Both funds come from IShares. IJR is a small-cap U.S. equity ETF, while IWF is a U.S. growth equity ETF. IJR and IWF show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 0.09%. They share 14 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by ENPH, CORT, and RNG.

  • 0.09% weighted overlap across 14 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 45.56% of the measured overlap.
  • IJR and IWF are closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche ETF pair.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both can still add materially different exposure.

Data Freshness

IJR holdings
Mar 12, 2026
IWF holdings
Mar 12, 2026
Overlap computed
Mar 15, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

About These ETFs

ETF A

IJR

iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.06%
AUM
$92B
Inception
May 22, 2000

ETF B

IWF

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.18%
AUM
$117B
Inception
May 22, 2000

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

Both funds come from IShares. IJR is a small-cap U.S. equity ETF, while IWF is a U.S. growth equity ETF. IJR and IWF do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like ENPH, CORT, and RNG.

02

How They Differ

Both funds come from IShares. IJR is a small-cap U.S. equity ETF, while IWF is a U.S. growth equity ETF. Neither fund clearly dominates on breadth, so the practical difference is more about weighting, index construction, and cost. IJR has the lower expense ratio, while IWF charges more for its exposure.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 45.56% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

Because IJR and IWF are closer in breadth, the better fit usually comes down to index methodology, issuer preference, and cost. IJR has the lower expense ratio, while IWF charges more for its exposure.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 45.56% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between IJR and IWF.

HoldingIJR Wt.IWF Wt.Overlap
ENPH0.38%0.02%0.02%
CORT0.21%0.01%0.01%
RNG0.20%0.01%0.01%
ETSY0.35%0.01%0.01%
APLS0.13%0.01%0.01%
AWI0.47%0.01%0.01%
INSP0.10%0.01%0.01%
SRPT0.12%0.01%0.01%
FRPT0.26%0.00%0.00%
DV0.09%0.00%0.00%

Why These ETFs Overlap

Both funds come from IShares. IJR is a small-cap U.S. equity ETF, while IWF is a U.S. growth equity ETF. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are ENPH, CORT, and RNG, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both IJR and IWF can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions About IJR and IWF

What is the overlap between IJR and IWF?+
IJR and IWF currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 0.09% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do IJR and IWF share?+
They share 14 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the IJR and IWF overlap high?+
The current verdict is Low Overlap. That means the two ETFs have limited duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do IJR and IWF overlap?+
IJR and IWF overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 45.56% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, IJR or IWF?+
IJR and IWF look closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche pair, so the main difference is more about strategy and weighting than simple market coverage.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/IJR-IWF.