ITOT vs IWB Overlap

Both funds come from IShares. ITOT is an equity ETF, while IWB is an equity ETF. ITOT and IWB show very heavy overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 94.61%. They share 978 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT.

94.6% overlap
#
978Shared Holdings
OK
Very High Overlap

Served from cache.

Quick Answer

Both funds come from IShares. ITOT is an equity ETF, while IWB is an equity ETF. ITOT and IWB show very heavy overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 94.61%. They share 978 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT.

  • 94.61% weighted overlap across 978 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 18.28% of the measured overlap.
  • ITOT and IWB are closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche ETF pair.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both may add less diversification than the fund names imply.

Data Freshness

ITOT holdings
Mar 12, 2026
IWB holdings
Mar 12, 2026
Overlap computed
Mar 15, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

About These ETFs

ETF A

ITOT

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.03%
AUM
$82B
Inception
Jan 20, 2004

ETF B

IWB

iShares Russell 1000 ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.15%
AUM
$45B
Inception
May 15, 2000

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

Both funds come from IShares. ITOT is an equity ETF, while IWB is an equity ETF. ITOT and IWB are closely aligned. A large share of their portfolio weight is invested in the same companies, especially NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, which means holding both is likely to feel similar to increasing the size of one core position.

02

How They Differ

Both funds come from IShares. ITOT is an equity ETF, while IWB is an equity ETF. Neither fund clearly dominates on breadth, so the practical difference is more about weighting, index construction, and cost. ITOT has the lower expense ratio, while IWB charges more for its exposure.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 18.28% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

Because ITOT and IWB are closer in breadth, the better fit usually comes down to index methodology, issuer preference, and cost. ITOT has the lower expense ratio, while IWB charges more for its exposure.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 18.28% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between ITOT and IWB.

HoldingITOT Wt.IWB Wt.Overlap
NVDA6.84%6.95%6.84%
AAPL5.87%6.11%5.87%
MSFT4.59%4.83%4.59%
AMZN3.17%3.30%3.17%
GOOGL2.72%2.87%2.72%
AVGO2.46%2.54%2.46%
GOOG2.17%2.33%2.17%
META2.17%2.29%2.17%
TSLA1.71%1.81%1.71%
BRK-B1.38%1.46%1.38%

Why These ETFs Overlap

Both funds come from IShares. ITOT is an equity ETF, while IWB is an equity ETF. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both ITOT and IWB is usually redundant unless you have a very specific reason to tilt toward their shared holdings. In most cases, one ETF is enough.

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions About ITOT and IWB

What is the overlap between ITOT and IWB?+
ITOT and IWB currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 94.61% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do ITOT and IWB share?+
They share 978 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the ITOT and IWB overlap high?+
The current verdict is Very High Overlap. That means the two ETFs have substantial duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do ITOT and IWB overlap?+
ITOT and IWB overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 18.28% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, ITOT or IWB?+
ITOT and IWB look closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche pair, so the main difference is more about strategy and weighting than simple market coverage.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/ITOT-IWB.