ITOT vs MTUM Overlap

Both funds come from IShares. ITOT is an equity ETF, while MTUM is an equity ETF. ITOT and MTUM show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 30.8%. They share 123 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, GOOGL, and AVGO.

30.8% overlap
#
123Shared Holdings
OK
Moderate Overlap

Served from cache.

Quick Answer

Both funds come from IShares. ITOT is an equity ETF, while MTUM is an equity ETF. ITOT and MTUM show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 30.8%. They share 123 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, GOOGL, and AVGO.

  • 30.8% weighted overlap across 123 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 32.66% of the measured overlap.
  • ITOT and MTUM are closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche ETF pair.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both may add less diversification than the fund names imply.

Data Freshness

ITOT holdings
Mar 12, 2026
MTUM holdings
Mar 12, 2026
Overlap computed
Mar 15, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

About These ETFs

ETF A

ITOT

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.03%
AUM
$82B
Inception
Jan 20, 2004

ETF B

MTUM

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.15%
AUM
$21B
Inception
Apr 16, 2013

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

Both funds come from IShares. ITOT is an equity ETF, while MTUM is an equity ETF. ITOT and MTUM overlap enough to matter, but they still bring different exposures to a portfolio. The overlap is concentrated in holdings such as NVDA, GOOGL, and AVGO, which explains why the score lands at 30.8%.

02

How They Differ

Both funds come from IShares. ITOT is an equity ETF, while MTUM is an equity ETF. Neither fund clearly dominates on breadth, so the practical difference is more about weighting, index construction, and cost. ITOT has the lower expense ratio, while MTUM charges more for its exposure.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 32.66% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

Because ITOT and MTUM are closer in breadth, the better fit usually comes down to index methodology, issuer preference, and cost. ITOT has the lower expense ratio, while MTUM charges more for its exposure.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 32.66% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between ITOT and MTUM.

HoldingITOT Wt.MTUM Wt.Overlap
NVDA6.84%4.91%4.91%
GOOGL2.72%2.69%2.69%
AVGO2.46%5.07%2.46%
GOOG2.17%2.19%2.17%
JPM1.20%3.02%1.20%
XOM0.95%3.77%0.95%
JNJ0.89%4.55%0.89%
WMT0.83%2.99%0.83%
MU0.69%4.96%0.69%
PLTR0.53%1.89%0.53%

Why These ETFs Overlap

Both funds come from IShares. ITOT is an equity ETF, while MTUM is an equity ETF. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are NVDA, GOOGL, and AVGO, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both ITOT and MTUM can still be reasonable, but you should expect some duplication. The decision comes down to whether the non-overlapping parts of each ETF are important enough for your strategy.

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions About ITOT and MTUM

What is the overlap between ITOT and MTUM?+
ITOT and MTUM currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 30.8% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do ITOT and MTUM share?+
They share 123 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the ITOT and MTUM overlap high?+
The current verdict is Moderate Overlap. That means the two ETFs have noticeable duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do ITOT and MTUM overlap?+
ITOT and MTUM overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 32.66% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, ITOT or MTUM?+
ITOT and MTUM look closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche pair, so the main difference is more about strategy and weighting than simple market coverage.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/ITOT-MTUM.