ITOT vs SCHG Overlap

ITOT is an equity ETF from IShares, while SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab. ITOT and SCHG show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 49.34%. They share 190 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT.

49.3% overlap
#
190Shared Holdings
OK
Moderate Overlap

Served from cache.

Quick Answer

ITOT is an equity ETF from IShares, while SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab. ITOT and SCHG show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 49.34%. They share 190 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT.

  • 49.34% weighted overlap across 190 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 35.06% of the measured overlap.
  • SCHG is the broader fund, while ITOT is more targeted.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both may add less diversification than the fund names imply.

Data Freshness

ITOT holdings
Mar 12, 2026
SCHG holdings
Mar 12, 2026
Overlap computed
Mar 15, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

About These ETFs

ETF A

ITOT

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.03%
AUM
$82B
Inception
Jan 20, 2004

ETF B

SCHG

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

Issuer
Schwab
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.04%
AUM
$51B
Inception
Dec 11, 2009

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

ITOT is an equity ETF from IShares, while SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab. ITOT and SCHG overlap enough to matter, but they still bring different exposures to a portfolio. The overlap is concentrated in holdings such as NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, which explains why the score lands at 49.34%.

02

How They Differ

ITOT is an equity ETF from IShares, while SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab. SCHG is the broader fund, while ITOT is the more targeted sleeve. ITOT has the lower expense ratio, while SCHG charges more for its exposure.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 35.06% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

If you want the broader portfolio building block, SCHG is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, ITOT is the narrower expression. ITOT has the lower expense ratio, while SCHG charges more for its exposure.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 35.06% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between ITOT and SCHG.

HoldingITOT Wt.SCHG Wt.Overlap
NVDA6.84%11.27%6.84%
AAPL5.87%9.67%5.87%
MSFT4.59%7.57%4.59%
AMZN3.17%5.23%3.17%
GOOGL2.72%4.48%2.72%
AVGO2.46%4.21%2.46%
GOOG2.17%3.58%2.17%
META2.17%4.62%2.17%
TSLA1.71%4.17%1.71%
LLY1.21%3.01%1.21%

Why These ETFs Overlap

ITOT is an equity ETF from IShares, while SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both ITOT and SCHG can still be reasonable, but you should expect some duplication. The decision comes down to whether the non-overlapping parts of each ETF are important enough for your strategy.

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions About ITOT and SCHG

What is the overlap between ITOT and SCHG?+
ITOT and SCHG currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 49.34% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do ITOT and SCHG share?+
They share 190 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the ITOT and SCHG overlap high?+
The current verdict is Moderate Overlap. That means the two ETFs have noticeable duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do ITOT and SCHG overlap?+
ITOT and SCHG overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 35.06% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, ITOT or SCHG?+
SCHG is the broader fund, while ITOT is the more targeted sleeve. That does not automatically make one better, but it helps explain why the pair can overlap while still serving different roles.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/ITOT-SCHG.