ITOT vs SCHV Overlap

ITOT is an equity ETF from IShares, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab. ITOT and SCHV show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 40.01%. They share 520 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by JPM, XOM, and JNJ.

40.0% overlap
#
520Shared Holdings
OK
Moderate Overlap

Served from cache.

Quick Answer

ITOT is an equity ETF from IShares, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab. ITOT and SCHV show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 40.01%. They share 520 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by JPM, XOM, and JNJ.

  • 40.01% weighted overlap across 520 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 7.6% of the measured overlap.
  • SCHV is the broader fund, while ITOT is more targeted.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both may add less diversification than the fund names imply.

Data Freshness

ITOT holdings
Mar 12, 2026
SCHV holdings
Mar 12, 2026
Overlap computed
Mar 15, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

About These ETFs

ETF A

ITOT

iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.03%
AUM
$82B
Inception
Jan 20, 2004

ETF B

SCHV

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF

Issuer
Schwab
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.04%
AUM
$15B
Inception
Dec 11, 2009

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

ITOT is an equity ETF from IShares, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab. ITOT and SCHV overlap enough to matter, but they still bring different exposures to a portfolio. The overlap is concentrated in holdings such as JPM, XOM, and JNJ, which explains why the score lands at 40.01%.

02

How They Differ

ITOT is an equity ETF from IShares, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab. SCHV is the broader fund, while ITOT is the more targeted sleeve. ITOT has the lower expense ratio, while SCHV charges more for its exposure.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 7.6% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

If you want the broader portfolio building block, SCHV is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, ITOT is the narrower expression. ITOT has the lower expense ratio, while SCHV charges more for its exposure.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 7.6% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between ITOT and SCHV.

HoldingITOT Wt.SCHV Wt.Overlap
JPM1.20%2.75%1.20%
XOM0.95%2.19%0.95%
JNJ0.89%2.06%0.89%
WMT0.83%1.92%0.83%
MU0.69%1.58%0.69%
ABBV0.61%1.41%0.61%
PG0.56%1.28%0.56%
HD0.54%1.25%0.54%
CVX0.54%1.24%0.54%
CAT0.51%1.18%0.51%

Why These ETFs Overlap

ITOT is an equity ETF from IShares, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are JPM, XOM, and JNJ, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both ITOT and SCHV can still be reasonable, but you should expect some duplication. The decision comes down to whether the non-overlapping parts of each ETF are important enough for your strategy.

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions About ITOT and SCHV

What is the overlap between ITOT and SCHV?+
ITOT and SCHV currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 40.01% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do ITOT and SCHV share?+
They share 520 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the ITOT and SCHV overlap high?+
The current verdict is Moderate Overlap. That means the two ETFs have noticeable duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do ITOT and SCHV overlap?+
ITOT and SCHV overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 7.6% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, ITOT or SCHV?+
SCHV is the broader fund, while ITOT is the more targeted sleeve. That does not automatically make one better, but it helps explain why the pair can overlap while still serving different roles.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/ITOT-SCHV.