ITOT vs VT Overlap
ITOT is an equity ETF from IShares, while VT is an equity ETF from Vanguard. ITOT and VT show heavy overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 58.38%. They share 1470 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
ITOT is an equity ETF from IShares, while VT is an equity ETF from Vanguard. ITOT and VT show heavy overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 58.38%. They share 1470 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT.
- 58.38% weighted overlap across 1470 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 18.06% of the measured overlap.
- VT is the broader fund, while ITOT is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both may add less diversification than the fund names imply.
Data Freshness
- ITOT holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- VT holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
ITOT is an equity ETF from IShares, while VT is an equity ETF from Vanguard. ITOT and VT share a large chunk of the same portfolio weight. The overlap is driven by positions like NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, so owning both may not diversify your stock exposure as much as the fund names suggest.
How They Differ
ITOT is an equity ETF from IShares, while VT is an equity ETF from Vanguard. VT is the broader fund, while ITOT is the more targeted sleeve. ITOT has the lower expense ratio, while VT charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 18.06% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, VT is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, ITOT is the narrower expression. ITOT has the lower expense ratio, while VT charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 18.06% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between ITOT and VT.
| Holding | Name | ITOT Wt. | VT Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | NVIDIA CORP | 6.84% | 4.12% | 4.12% |
| AAPL | APPLE INC | 5.87% | 3.48% | 3.48% |
| MSFT | MICROSOFT CORP | 4.59% | 2.94% | 2.94% |
| AMZN | AMAZON COM INC | 3.17% | 2.12% | 2.12% |
| GOOGL | ALPHABET INC CLASS A | 2.72% | 1.82% | 1.82% |
| GOOG | ALPHABET INC CLASS C | 2.17% | 1.47% | 1.47% |
| META | META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A | 2.17% | 1.44% | 1.44% |
| AVGO | BROADCOM INC | 2.46% | 1.41% | 1.41% |
| TSLA | TESLA INC | 1.71% | 1.12% | 1.12% |
| LLY | ELI LILLY | 1.21% | 0.77% | 0.77% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
ITOT is an equity ETF from IShares, while VT is an equity ETF from Vanguard. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both ITOT and VT may add less diversification than you expect. Many investors would choose the ETF that best matches their goal and avoid paying for duplicate exposure.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About ITOT and VT
What is the overlap between ITOT and VT?+
How many holdings do ITOT and VT share?+
Is the ITOT and VT overlap high?+
Why do ITOT and VT overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, ITOT or VT?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.