ITOT vs XLI Overlap
ITOT is an equity ETF from IShares, while XLI is an industrials ETF from SPDR. ITOT and XLI show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 7.53%. They share 75 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by GE, CAT, and RTX.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
ITOT is an equity ETF from IShares, while XLI is an industrials ETF from SPDR. ITOT and XLI show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 7.53%. They share 75 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by GE, CAT, and RTX.
- 7.53% weighted overlap across 75 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 19.36% of the measured overlap.
- ITOT is the broader fund, while XLI is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- ITOT holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- XLI holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
ITOT is an equity ETF from IShares, while XLI is an industrials ETF from SPDR. ITOT and XLI do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like GE, CAT, and RTX.
How They Differ
ITOT is an equity ETF from IShares, while XLI is an industrials ETF from SPDR. ITOT is the broader fund, while XLI is the more targeted sleeve. ITOT has the lower expense ratio, while XLI charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 19.36% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, ITOT is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, XLI is the narrower expression. ITOT has the lower expense ratio, while XLI charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 19.36% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between ITOT and XLI.
| Holding | Name | ITOT Wt. | XLI Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GE | GE AEROSPACE | 0.52% | 6.62% | 0.52% |
| CAT | CATERPILLAR INC | 0.51% | 6.44% | 0.51% |
| RTX | RTX CORP | 0.42% | 5.33% | 0.42% |
| GEV | GE VERNOVA INC | 0.35% | 4.37% | 0.35% |
| BA | BOEING | 0.26% | 3.28% | 0.26% |
| HON | HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC | 0.23% | 2.94% | 0.23% |
| UBER | UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC | 0.23% | 2.89% | 0.23% |
| DE | DEERE | 0.23% | 2.86% | 0.23% |
| UNP | UNION PACIFIC CORP | 0.23% | 2.85% | 0.23% |
| LMT | LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP | 0.20% | 2.55% | 0.20% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
ITOT is an equity ETF from IShares, while XLI is an industrials ETF from SPDR. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are GE, CAT, and RTX, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both ITOT and XLI can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About ITOT and XLI
What is the overlap between ITOT and XLI?+
How many holdings do ITOT and XLI share?+
Is the ITOT and XLI overlap high?+
Why do ITOT and XLI overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, ITOT or XLI?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.