IVW vs MTUM Overlap
Both funds come from IShares. IVW is a U.S. growth equity ETF, while MTUM is an equity ETF. IVW and MTUM show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 36.28%. They share 62 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by AVGO, NVDA, and GOOGL.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
Both funds come from IShares. IVW is a U.S. growth equity ETF, while MTUM is an equity ETF. IVW and MTUM show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 36.28%. They share 62 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by AVGO, NVDA, and GOOGL.
- 36.28% weighted overlap across 62 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 34.9% of the measured overlap.
- IVW is the broader fund, while MTUM is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both may add less diversification than the fund names imply.
Data Freshness
- IVW holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- MTUM holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
Both funds come from IShares. IVW is a U.S. growth equity ETF, while MTUM is an equity ETF. IVW and MTUM overlap enough to matter, but they still bring different exposures to a portfolio. The overlap is concentrated in holdings such as AVGO, NVDA, and GOOGL, which explains why the score lands at 36.28%.
How They Differ
Both funds come from IShares. IVW is a U.S. growth equity ETF, while MTUM is an equity ETF. IVW is the broader fund, while MTUM is the more targeted sleeve. MTUM has the lower expense ratio, while IVW charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 34.9% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, IVW is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, MTUM is the narrower expression. MTUM has the lower expense ratio, while IVW charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 34.9% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between IVW and MTUM.
| Holding | Name | IVW Wt. | MTUM Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVGO | BROADCOM INC | 5.31% | 5.07% | 5.07% |
| NVDA | NVIDIA CORP | 14.73% | 4.91% | 4.91% |
| GOOGL | ALPHABET INC CLASS A | 5.86% | 2.69% | 2.69% |
| GOOG | ALPHABET INC CLASS C | 4.68% | 2.19% | 2.19% |
| JPM | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO | 1.75% | 3.02% | 1.75% |
| MU | MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 1.48% | 4.96% | 1.48% |
| JNJ | JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 1.14% | 4.55% | 1.14% |
| PLTR | PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC CLASS A | 1.13% | 1.89% | 1.13% |
| CAT | CATERPILLAR INC | 1.10% | 2.95% | 1.10% |
| AMD | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC | 1.08% | 2.64% | 1.08% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
Both funds come from IShares. IVW is a U.S. growth equity ETF, while MTUM is an equity ETF. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are AVGO, NVDA, and GOOGL, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both IVW and MTUM can still be reasonable, but you should expect some duplication. The decision comes down to whether the non-overlapping parts of each ETF are important enough for your strategy.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About IVW and MTUM
What is the overlap between IVW and MTUM?+
How many holdings do IVW and MTUM share?+
Is the IVW and MTUM overlap high?+
Why do IVW and MTUM overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, IVW or MTUM?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.