IVW is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco. IVW and RSP show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 19.94%. They share 135 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by AMD, SNDK, and PWR.
Freshly computed.
Quick Answer
IVW is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco. IVW and RSP show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 19.94%. They share 135 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by AMD, SNDK, and PWR.
Data Freshness
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
IVW is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco. IVW and RSP do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like AMD, SNDK, and PWR.
IVW is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco. Neither fund clearly dominates on breadth, so the practical difference is more about weighting, index construction, and cost. IVW has the lower expense ratio, while RSP charges more for its exposure.
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 4.51% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
Because IVW and RSP are closer in breadth, the better fit usually comes down to index methodology, issuer preference, and cost. IVW has the lower expense ratio, while RSP charges more for its exposure.
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 4.51% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between IVW and RSP.
| Holding | Name | IVW Wt. | RSP Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD | Advanced Micro Devices Inc. | 1.14% | 0.33% | 0.33% |
| SNDK | SANDISK CORP | 0.32% | 0.32% | 0.32% |
| PWR | Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.28% | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| GEV | GE Vernova Inc. | 0.81% | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| CAT | Caterpillar Inc | 1.14% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
| ANET | Arista Networks Inc | 0.44% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
| AMZN | Amazon.com, Inc. | 3.72% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
| GLW | Corning Incorporated | 0.25% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
| MU | Micron Technology Inc. | 1.31% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
| VRT | Vertiv Holdings Co | 0.33% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
IVW is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are AMD, SNDK, and PWR, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both IVW and RSP can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Go deeper
Portwise gives you full portfolio diagnostics — concentration risk, hidden risk scoring, drawdown analysis, and risk evolution tracking. Free to start.
Stay informed
Portfolio overlap alerts, new comparison data, and investing insights from the CG Corp team. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.