IVW vs SCHD Overlap
IVW is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while SCHD is a dividend-focused equity ETF from Schwab. IVW and SCHD show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 2.05%. They share 5 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by ABBV, CSCO, and AMGN.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
IVW is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while SCHD is a dividend-focused equity ETF from Schwab. IVW and SCHD show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 2.05%. They share 5 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by ABBV, CSCO, and AMGN.
- 2.05% weighted overlap across 5 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 77.46% of the measured overlap.
- IVW is the broader fund, while SCHD is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- IVW holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- SCHD holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 13, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
IVW is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while SCHD is a dividend-focused equity ETF from Schwab. IVW and SCHD do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like ABBV, CSCO, and AMGN.
How They Differ
IVW is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while SCHD is a dividend-focused equity ETF from Schwab. IVW is the broader fund, while SCHD is the more targeted sleeve. SCHD has the lower expense ratio, while IVW charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 77.46% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, IVW is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, SCHD is the narrower expression. SCHD has the lower expense ratio, while IVW charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 77.46% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between IVW and SCHD.
| Holding | Name | IVW Wt. | SCHD Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABBV | ABBVIE INC | 0.60% | 3.56% | 0.60% |
| CSCO | CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 0.53% | 3.61% | 0.53% |
| AMGN | AMGEN INC | 0.45% | 3.92% | 0.45% |
| KO | COCA-COLA | 0.41% | 3.97% | 0.41% |
| CINF | CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORP | 0.05% | 0.95% | 0.05% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
IVW is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while SCHD is a dividend-focused equity ETF from Schwab. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are ABBV, CSCO, and AMGN, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both IVW and SCHD can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About IVW and SCHD
What is the overlap between IVW and SCHD?+
How many holdings do IVW and SCHD share?+
Is the IVW and SCHD overlap high?+
Why do IVW and SCHD overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, IVW or SCHD?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.