IWB is an equity ETF from IShares, while SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab. IWB and SCHG show heavy overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 50.11%. They share 182 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT.
Freshly computed.
Quick Answer
IWB is an equity ETF from IShares, while SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab. IWB and SCHG show heavy overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 50.11%. They share 182 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT.
Data Freshness
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
IWB is an equity ETF from IShares, while SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab. IWB and SCHG share a large chunk of the same portfolio weight. The overlap is driven by positions like NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, so owning both may not diversify your stock exposure as much as the fund names suggest.
IWB is an equity ETF from IShares, while SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab. SCHG is the broader fund, while IWB is the more targeted sleeve. SCHG has the lower expense ratio, while IWB charges more for its exposure.
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 34.91% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
If you want the broader portfolio building block, SCHG is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, IWB is the narrower expression. SCHG has the lower expense ratio, while IWB charges more for its exposure.
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 34.91% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between IWB and SCHG.
| Holding | Name | IWB Wt. | SCHG Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | NVIDIA CORPORATION | 6.81% | 11.01% | 6.81% |
| AAPL | APPLE INC. | 6.10% | 9.83% | 6.10% |
| MSFT | MICROSOFT CORPORATION | 4.58% | 7.17% | 4.58% |
| AMZN | AMAZON.COM, INC. | 3.33% | 5.67% | 3.33% |
| GOOGL | ALPHABET INC. | 2.79% | 4.75% | 2.79% |
| AVGO | BROADCOM INC. | 2.39% | 4.55% | 2.39% |
| GOOG | ALPHABET INC. | 2.27% | 3.78% | 2.27% |
| META | META PLATFORMS, INC. | 2.08% | 3.45% | 2.08% |
| TSLA | TESLA, INC. | 1.75% | 3.91% | 1.75% |
| LLY | ELI LILLY AND COMPANY | 1.23% | 3.05% | 1.23% |
IWB is an equity ETF from IShares, while SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both IWB and SCHG may add less diversification than you expect. Many investors would choose the ETF that best matches their goal and avoid paying for duplicate exposure.
Go deeper
Portwise gives you full portfolio diagnostics — concentration risk, hidden risk scoring, drawdown analysis, and risk evolution tracking. Free to start.
Stay informed
Portfolio overlap alerts, new comparison data, and investing insights from the CG Corp team. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.