IWB vs SPLG Overlap

IWB is an equity ETF from IShares, while SPLG is a U.S. large-cap core ETF from SPDR. IWB and SPLG show very heavy overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 85.55%. They share 471 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT.

85.5% overlap
#
471Shared Holdings
OK
Very High Overlap

Served from cache.

Quick Answer

IWB is an equity ETF from IShares, while SPLG is a U.S. large-cap core ETF from SPDR. IWB and SPLG show very heavy overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 85.55%. They share 471 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT.

  • 85.55% weighted overlap across 471 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 20.91% of the measured overlap.
  • SPLG is the broader fund, while IWB is more targeted.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both may add less diversification than the fund names imply.

Data Freshness

IWB holdings
Mar 12, 2026
SPLG holdings
Mar 12, 2026
Overlap computed
Mar 15, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

About These ETFs

ETF A

IWB

iShares Russell 1000 ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.15%
AUM
$45B
Inception
May 15, 2000

ETF B

SPLG

SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF

Issuer
SPDR
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.02%
AUM
$96B
Inception
Nov 7, 2005

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

IWB is an equity ETF from IShares, while SPLG is a U.S. large-cap core ETF from SPDR. IWB and SPLG are closely aligned. A large share of their portfolio weight is invested in the same companies, especially NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, which means holding both is likely to feel similar to increasing the size of one core position.

02

How They Differ

IWB is an equity ETF from IShares, while SPLG is a U.S. large-cap core ETF from SPDR. SPLG is the broader fund, while IWB is the more targeted sleeve. SPLG has the lower expense ratio, while IWB charges more for its exposure.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 20.91% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

If you want the broader portfolio building block, SPLG is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, IWB is the narrower expression. SPLG has the lower expense ratio, while IWB charges more for its exposure.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 20.91% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between IWB and SPLG.

HoldingIWB Wt.SPLG Wt.Overlap
NVDA6.95%8.34%6.95%
AAPL6.11%6.79%6.11%
MSFT4.83%6.85%4.83%
AMZN3.30%3.78%3.30%
GOOGL2.87%2.64%2.64%
AVGO2.54%2.98%2.54%
META2.29%2.77%2.29%
GOOG2.33%2.13%2.13%
TSLA1.81%2.20%1.81%
BRK-B1.46%1.50%1.46%

Why These ETFs Overlap

IWB is an equity ETF from IShares, while SPLG is a U.S. large-cap core ETF from SPDR. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both IWB and SPLG is usually redundant unless you have a very specific reason to tilt toward their shared holdings. In most cases, one ETF is enough.

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions About IWB and SPLG

What is the overlap between IWB and SPLG?+
IWB and SPLG currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 85.55% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do IWB and SPLG share?+
They share 471 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the IWB and SPLG overlap high?+
The current verdict is Very High Overlap. That means the two ETFs have substantial duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do IWB and SPLG overlap?+
IWB and SPLG overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 20.91% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, IWB or SPLG?+
SPLG is the broader fund, while IWB is the more targeted sleeve. That does not automatically make one better, but it helps explain why the pair can overlap while still serving different roles.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/IWB-SPLG.