IWB vs XLE Overlap
IWB is an equity ETF from IShares, while XLE is an energy sector ETF from SPDR. IWB and XLE show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 3.14%. They share 21 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by XOM, CVX, and COP.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
IWB is an equity ETF from IShares, while XLE is an energy sector ETF from SPDR. IWB and XLE show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 3.14%. They share 21 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by XOM, CVX, and COP.
- 3.14% weighted overlap across 21 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 57.17% of the measured overlap.
- IWB is the broader fund, while XLE is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- IWB holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- XLE holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
IWB is an equity ETF from IShares, while XLE is an energy sector ETF from SPDR. IWB and XLE do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like XOM, CVX, and COP.
How They Differ
IWB is an equity ETF from IShares, while XLE is an energy sector ETF from SPDR. IWB is the broader fund, while XLE is the more targeted sleeve. XLE has the lower expense ratio, while IWB charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 57.17% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, IWB is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, XLE is the narrower expression. XLE has the lower expense ratio, while IWB charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 57.17% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between IWB and XLE.
| Holding | Name | IWB Wt. | XLE Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | EXXON MOBIL CORP | 1.00% | 23.52% | 1.00% |
| CVX | CHEVRON CORP | 0.56% | 17.34% | 0.56% |
| COP | CONOCOPHILLIPS | 0.23% | 6.94% | 0.23% |
| WMB | WILLIAMS INC | 0.14% | 4.53% | 0.14% |
| EOG | EOG RESOURCES INC | 0.11% | 3.99% | 0.11% |
| MPC | MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP | 0.11% | 3.72% | 0.11% |
| PSX | PHILLIPS | 0.11% | 3.76% | 0.11% |
| VLO | VALERO ENERGY CORP | 0.11% | 3.80% | 0.11% |
| KMI | KINDER MORGAN INC | 0.10% | 3.71% | 0.10% |
| BKR | BAKER HUGHES CLASS A | 0.10% | 3.36% | 0.10% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
IWB is an equity ETF from IShares, while XLE is an energy sector ETF from SPDR. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are XOM, CVX, and COP, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both IWB and XLE can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About IWB and XLE
What is the overlap between IWB and XLE?+
How many holdings do IWB and XLE share?+
Is the IWB and XLE overlap high?+
Why do IWB and XLE overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, IWB or XLE?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.