IWF vs RSP Overlap

IWF is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco. IWF and RSP show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 19.34%. They share 183 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by HWM, LRCX, and AMAT.

19.3% overlap
#
183Shared Holdings
OK
Low Overlap

Served from cache.

Quick Answer

IWF is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco. IWF and RSP show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 19.34%. They share 183 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by HWM, LRCX, and AMAT.

  • 19.34% weighted overlap across 183 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 3.9% of the measured overlap.
  • RSP is the broader fund, while IWF is more targeted.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both can still add materially different exposure.

Data Freshness

IWF holdings
Mar 12, 2026
RSP holdings
Mar 12, 2026
Overlap computed
Mar 15, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

About These ETFs

ETF A

IWF

iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.18%
AUM
$117B
Inception
May 22, 2000

ETF B

RSP

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF

Issuer
Invesco
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.2%
AUM
$87B
Inception
Apr 24, 2003

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

IWF is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco. IWF and RSP do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like HWM, LRCX, and AMAT.

02

How They Differ

IWF is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco. RSP is the broader fund, while IWF is the more targeted sleeve. IWF has the lower expense ratio, while RSP charges more for its exposure.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 3.9% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

If you want the broader portfolio building block, RSP is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, IWF is the narrower expression. IWF has the lower expense ratio, while RSP charges more for its exposure.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 3.9% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between IWF and RSP.

HoldingIWF Wt.RSP Wt.Overlap
HWM0.35%0.26%0.26%
LRCX0.94%0.25%0.25%
AMAT0.27%0.25%0.25%
AMGN0.52%0.23%0.23%
KLAC0.67%0.23%0.23%
GEV0.80%0.23%0.23%
GE1.18%0.23%0.23%
MCK0.37%0.22%0.22%
PWR0.22%0.24%0.22%
COST1.54%0.22%0.22%

Why These ETFs Overlap

IWF is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are HWM, LRCX, and AMAT, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both IWF and RSP can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions About IWF and RSP

What is the overlap between IWF and RSP?+
IWF and RSP currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 19.34% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do IWF and RSP share?+
They share 183 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the IWF and RSP overlap high?+
The current verdict is Low Overlap. That means the two ETFs have limited duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do IWF and RSP overlap?+
IWF and RSP overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 3.9% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, IWF or RSP?+
RSP is the broader fund, while IWF is the more targeted sleeve. That does not automatically make one better, but it helps explain why the pair can overlap while still serving different roles.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/IWF-RSP.