IWF vs SCHV Overlap
IWF is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab. IWF and SCHV show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 14.92%. They share 139 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by ABBV, HD, and LRCX.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
IWF is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab. IWF and SCHV show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 14.92%. They share 139 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by ABBV, HD, and LRCX.
- 14.92% weighted overlap across 139 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 22% of the measured overlap.
- SCHV is the broader fund, while IWF is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- IWF holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- SCHV holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
IWF is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab. IWF and SCHV do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like ABBV, HD, and LRCX.
How They Differ
IWF is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab. SCHV is the broader fund, while IWF is the more targeted sleeve. SCHV has the lower expense ratio, while IWF charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 22% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, SCHV is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, IWF is the narrower expression. SCHV has the lower expense ratio, while IWF charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 22% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between IWF and SCHV.
| Holding | Name | IWF Wt. | SCHV Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABBV | ABBVIE INC | 1.40% | 1.41% | 1.40% |
| HD | HOME DEPOT INC | 0.94% | 1.25% | 0.94% |
| LRCX | LAM RESEARCH CORP | 0.94% | 0.95% | 0.94% |
| ORCL | ORACLE CORP | 0.88% | 0.88% | 0.88% |
| APH | AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A | 0.58% | 0.59% | 0.58% |
| AMGN | AMGEN INC | 0.52% | 0.71% | 0.52% |
| KO | COCA-COLA | 0.52% | 1.06% | 0.52% |
| HWM | HOWMET AEROSPACE INC | 0.35% | 0.36% | 0.35% |
| TJX | TJX INC | 0.31% | 0.62% | 0.31% |
| AMT | AMERICAN TOWER REIT CORP | 0.30% | 0.30% | 0.30% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
IWF is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are ABBV, HD, and LRCX, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both IWF and SCHV can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About IWF and SCHV
What is the overlap between IWF and SCHV?+
How many holdings do IWF and SCHV share?+
Is the IWF and SCHV overlap high?+
Why do IWF and SCHV overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, IWF or SCHV?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.