IWM vs IWO Overlap

Both funds come from IShares. IWM is an equity ETF, while IWO is a U.S. growth equity ETF. IWM and IWO show heavy overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 56.61%. They share 1072 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by BE, FN, and CRDO.

56.6% overlap
#
1072Shared Holdings
OK
High Overlap

Served from cache.

Quick Answer

Both funds come from IShares. IWM is an equity ETF, while IWO is a U.S. growth equity ETF. IWM and IWO show heavy overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 56.61%. They share 1072 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by BE, FN, and CRDO.

  • 56.61% weighted overlap across 1072 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 4.2% of the measured overlap.
  • IWM and IWO are closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche ETF pair.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both may add less diversification than the fund names imply.

Data Freshness

IWM holdings
Mar 12, 2026
IWO holdings
Mar 12, 2026
Overlap computed
Mar 15, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

About These ETFs

ETF A

IWM

iShares Russell 2000 ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.19%
AUM
$70B
Inception
May 22, 2000

ETF B

IWO

iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.24%
AUM
$13B
Inception
Jul 24, 2000

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

Both funds come from IShares. IWM is an equity ETF, while IWO is a U.S. growth equity ETF. IWM and IWO share a large chunk of the same portfolio weight. The overlap is driven by positions like BE, FN, and CRDO, so owning both may not diversify your stock exposure as much as the fund names suggest.

02

How They Differ

Both funds come from IShares. IWM is an equity ETF, while IWO is a U.S. growth equity ETF. Neither fund clearly dominates on breadth, so the practical difference is more about weighting, index construction, and cost. IWM has the lower expense ratio, while IWO charges more for its exposure.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 4.2% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

Because IWM and IWO are closer in breadth, the better fit usually comes down to index methodology, issuer preference, and cost. IWM has the lower expense ratio, while IWO charges more for its exposure.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 4.2% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between IWM and IWO.

HoldingIWM Wt.IWO Wt.Overlap
BE1.14%2.22%1.14%
FN0.66%1.29%0.66%
CRDO0.58%1.14%0.58%
NXT0.56%0.88%0.56%
KTOS0.54%1.06%0.54%
CDE0.50%0.49%0.49%
STRL0.41%0.81%0.41%
IONQ0.40%0.78%0.40%
BBIO0.40%0.78%0.40%
ENSG0.40%0.78%0.40%

Why These ETFs Overlap

Both funds come from IShares. IWM is an equity ETF, while IWO is a U.S. growth equity ETF. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are BE, FN, and CRDO, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both IWM and IWO may add less diversification than you expect. Many investors would choose the ETF that best matches their goal and avoid paying for duplicate exposure.

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions About IWM and IWO

What is the overlap between IWM and IWO?+
IWM and IWO currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 56.61% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do IWM and IWO share?+
They share 1072 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the IWM and IWO overlap high?+
The current verdict is High Overlap. That means the two ETFs have substantial duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do IWM and IWO overlap?+
IWM and IWO overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 4.2% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, IWM or IWO?+
IWM and IWO look closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche pair, so the main difference is more about strategy and weighting than simple market coverage.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/IWM-IWO.