IWN vs IWO Overlap

Both funds come from IShares. IWN is a U.S. value equity ETF, while IWO is a U.S. growth equity ETF. IWN and IWO show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 11.5%. They share 543 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by CDE, JBTM, and NXT.

11.5% overlap
#
543Shared Holdings
OK
Low Overlap

Served from cache.

Quick Answer

Both funds come from IShares. IWN is a U.S. value equity ETF, while IWO is a U.S. growth equity ETF. IWN and IWO show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 11.5%. They share 543 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by CDE, JBTM, and NXT.

  • 11.5% weighted overlap across 543 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 8.32% of the measured overlap.
  • IWN and IWO are closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche ETF pair.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both can still add materially different exposure.

Data Freshness

IWN holdings
Mar 12, 2026
IWO holdings
Mar 12, 2026
Overlap computed
Mar 15, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

About These ETFs

ETF A

IWN

iShares Russell 2000 Value ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.24%
AUM
$12B
Inception
Jul 24, 2000

ETF B

IWO

iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.24%
AUM
$13B
Inception
Jul 24, 2000

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

Both funds come from IShares. IWN is a U.S. value equity ETF, while IWO is a U.S. growth equity ETF. IWN and IWO do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like CDE, JBTM, and NXT.

02

How They Differ

Both funds come from IShares. IWN is a U.S. value equity ETF, while IWO is a U.S. growth equity ETF. Neither fund clearly dominates on breadth, so the practical difference is more about weighting, index construction, and cost. IWN and IWO are priced very similarly on expense ratio.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 8.32% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

Because IWN and IWO are closer in breadth, the better fit usually comes down to index methodology, issuer preference, and cost. IWN and IWO are priced very similarly on expense ratio.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 8.32% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between IWN and IWO.

HoldingIWN Wt.IWO Wt.Overlap
CDE0.52%0.49%0.49%
JBTM0.26%0.23%0.23%
NXT0.23%0.88%0.23%
HL0.74%0.22%0.22%
AHR0.40%0.21%0.21%
TEX0.28%0.20%0.20%
SANM0.25%0.19%0.19%
ITRI0.15%0.14%0.14%
FORM0.12%0.35%0.12%
RUSHA0.12%0.14%0.12%

Why These ETFs Overlap

Both funds come from IShares. IWN is a U.S. value equity ETF, while IWO is a U.S. growth equity ETF. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are CDE, JBTM, and NXT, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both IWN and IWO can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions About IWN and IWO

What is the overlap between IWN and IWO?+
IWN and IWO currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 11.5% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do IWN and IWO share?+
They share 543 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the IWN and IWO overlap high?+
The current verdict is Low Overlap. That means the two ETFs have limited duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do IWN and IWO overlap?+
IWN and IWO overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 8.32% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, IWN or IWO?+
IWN and IWO look closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche pair, so the main difference is more about strategy and weighting than simple market coverage.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/IWN-IWO.