IWP vs SCHG Overlap

IWP is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab. IWP and SCHG show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 8.26%. They share 95 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by VRT, PWR, and HLT.

8.3% overlap
#
95Shared Holdings
OK
Low Overlap

Served from cache.

Quick Answer

IWP is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab. IWP and SCHG show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 8.26%. They share 95 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by VRT, PWR, and HLT.

  • 8.26% weighted overlap across 95 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 11.78% of the measured overlap.
  • SCHG is the broader fund, while IWP is more targeted.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both can still add materially different exposure.

Data Freshness

IWP holdings
Mar 12, 2026
SCHG holdings
Mar 12, 2026
Overlap computed
Mar 15, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

About These ETFs

ETF A

IWP

iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.23%
AUM
$19B
Inception
Jul 17, 2001

ETF B

SCHG

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

Issuer
Schwab
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.04%
AUM
$51B
Inception
Dec 11, 2009

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

IWP is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab. IWP and SCHG do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like VRT, PWR, and HLT.

02

How They Differ

IWP is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab. SCHG is the broader fund, while IWP is the more targeted sleeve. SCHG has the lower expense ratio, while IWP charges more for its exposure.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 11.78% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

If you want the broader portfolio building block, SCHG is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, IWP is the narrower expression. SCHG has the lower expense ratio, while IWP charges more for its exposure.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 11.78% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between IWP and SCHG.

HoldingIWP Wt.SCHG Wt.Overlap
VRT3.55%0.39%0.39%
PWR2.22%0.32%0.32%
HLT2.35%0.26%0.26%
NET2.25%0.25%0.25%
HOOD0.27%0.23%0.23%
MPWR1.69%0.19%0.19%
TRGP1.71%0.19%0.19%
FIX1.66%0.18%0.18%
GWW1.43%0.18%0.18%
IDXX1.65%0.18%0.18%

Why These ETFs Overlap

IWP is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are VRT, PWR, and HLT, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both IWP and SCHG can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions About IWP and SCHG

What is the overlap between IWP and SCHG?+
IWP and SCHG currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 8.26% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do IWP and SCHG share?+
They share 95 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the IWP and SCHG overlap high?+
The current verdict is Low Overlap. That means the two ETFs have limited duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do IWP and SCHG overlap?+
IWP and SCHG overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 11.78% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, IWP or SCHG?+
SCHG is the broader fund, while IWP is the more targeted sleeve. That does not automatically make one better, but it helps explain why the pair can overlap while still serving different roles.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/IWP-SCHG.