IWP vs XLK Overlap
IWP is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while XLK is a technology-focused equity ETF from SPDR. IWP and XLK show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 2.08%. They share 11 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by MPWR, DDOG, and FICO.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
IWP is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while XLK is a technology-focused equity ETF from SPDR. IWP and XLK show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 2.08%. They share 11 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by MPWR, DDOG, and FICO.
- 2.08% weighted overlap across 11 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 51.44% of the measured overlap.
- IWP is the broader fund, while XLK is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- IWP holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- XLK holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
IWP is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while XLK is a technology-focused equity ETF from SPDR. IWP and XLK do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like MPWR, DDOG, and FICO.
How They Differ
IWP is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while XLK is a technology-focused equity ETF from SPDR. IWP is the broader fund, while XLK is the more targeted sleeve. XLK has the lower expense ratio, while IWP charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 51.44% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, IWP is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, XLK is the narrower expression. XLK has the lower expense ratio, while IWP charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 51.44% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between IWP and XLK.
| Holding | Name | IWP Wt. | XLK Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPWR | MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC | 1.69% | 0.45% | 0.45% |
| DDOG | DATADOG INC CLASS A | 1.33% | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| FICO | FAIR ISAAC CORP | 0.86% | 0.27% | 0.27% |
| JBL | JABIL INC | 0.60% | 0.24% | 0.24% |
| NTAP | NETAPP INC | 0.27% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
| SMCI | SUPER MICRO COMPUTER INC | 0.26% | 0.14% | 0.14% |
| TYL | TYLER TECHNOLOGIES INC | 0.44% | 0.14% | 0.14% |
| GDDY | GODADDY INC CLASS A | 0.42% | 0.11% | 0.11% |
| IT | GARTNER INC | 0.40% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
| PTC | PTC INC | 0.08% | 0.17% | 0.08% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
IWP is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while XLK is a technology-focused equity ETF from SPDR. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are MPWR, DDOG, and FICO, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both IWP and XLK can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About IWP and XLK
What is the overlap between IWP and XLK?+
How many holdings do IWP and XLK share?+
Is the IWP and XLK overlap high?+
Why do IWP and XLK overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, IWP or XLK?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.