IWP vs XLV Overlap
IWP is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while XLV is a health care sector ETF from SPDR. IWP and XLV show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 4.76%. They share 10 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by COR, CAH, and IDXX.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
IWP is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while XLV is a health care sector ETF from SPDR. IWP and XLV show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 4.76%. They share 10 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by COR, CAH, and IDXX.
- 4.76% weighted overlap across 10 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 62.9% of the measured overlap.
- IWP is the broader fund, while XLV is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- IWP holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- XLV holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
IWP is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while XLV is a health care sector ETF from SPDR. IWP and XLV do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like COR, CAH, and IDXX.
How They Differ
IWP is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while XLV is a health care sector ETF from SPDR. IWP is the broader fund, while XLV is the more targeted sleeve. XLV has the lower expense ratio, while IWP charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 62.9% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, IWP is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, XLV is the narrower expression. XLV has the lower expense ratio, while IWP charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 62.9% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between IWP and XLV.
| Holding | Name | IWP Wt. | XLV Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COR | CENCORA INC | 2.23% | 1.23% | 1.23% |
| CAH | CARDINAL HEALTH INC | 0.90% | 0.93% | 0.90% |
| IDXX | IDEXX LABORATORIES INC | 1.65% | 0.86% | 0.86% |
| DXCM | DEXCOM INC | 0.92% | 0.48% | 0.48% |
| WAT | WATERS CORP | 0.32% | 0.53% | 0.32% |
| PODD | INSULET CORP | 0.58% | 0.30% | 0.30% |
| RMD | RESMED INC | 0.29% | 0.65% | 0.29% |
| INCY | INCYTE CORP | 0.14% | 0.29% | 0.14% |
| MOH | MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC | 0.14% | 0.13% | 0.13% |
| DVA | DAVITA INC | 0.18% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
IWP is a U.S. growth equity ETF from IShares, while XLV is a health care sector ETF from SPDR. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are COR, CAH, and IDXX, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both IWP and XLV can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About IWP and XLV
What is the overlap between IWP and XLV?+
How many holdings do IWP and XLV share?+
Is the IWP and XLV overlap high?+
Why do IWP and XLV overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, IWP or XLV?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.