IWR vs QUAL Overlap

Both funds come from IShares. IWR is a mid-cap U.S. equity ETF, while QUAL is an equity ETF. IWR and QUAL show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 9.5%. They share 58 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by FAST, MPWR, and GWW.

9.5% overlap
#
58Shared Holdings
OK
Low Overlap

Served from cache.

Quick Answer

Both funds come from IShares. IWR is a mid-cap U.S. equity ETF, while QUAL is an equity ETF. IWR and QUAL show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 9.5%. They share 58 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by FAST, MPWR, and GWW.

  • 9.5% weighted overlap across 58 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 12.34% of the measured overlap.
  • IWR and QUAL are closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche ETF pair.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both can still add materially different exposure.

Data Freshness

IWR holdings
Mar 12, 2026
QUAL holdings
Mar 12, 2026
Overlap computed
Mar 15, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

About These ETFs

ETF A

IWR

iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.18%
AUM
$48B
Inception
Jul 17, 2001

ETF B

QUAL

iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.15%
AUM
$49B
Inception
Jul 16, 2013

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

Both funds come from IShares. IWR is a mid-cap U.S. equity ETF, while QUAL is an equity ETF. IWR and QUAL do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like FAST, MPWR, and GWW.

02

How They Differ

Both funds come from IShares. IWR is a mid-cap U.S. equity ETF, while QUAL is an equity ETF. Neither fund clearly dominates on breadth, so the practical difference is more about weighting, index construction, and cost. QUAL has the lower expense ratio, while IWR charges more for its exposure.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 12.34% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

Because IWR and QUAL are closer in breadth, the better fit usually comes down to index methodology, issuer preference, and cost. QUAL has the lower expense ratio, while IWR charges more for its exposure.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 12.34% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between IWR and QUAL.

HoldingIWR Wt.QUAL Wt.Overlap
FAST0.41%0.47%0.41%
MPWR0.38%0.47%0.38%
GWW0.38%0.48%0.38%
FIX0.38%0.42%0.38%
SPG0.48%0.35%0.35%
IDXX0.37%0.31%0.31%
GRMN0.31%0.87%0.31%
DHI0.30%0.74%0.30%
ODFL0.28%0.28%0.28%
FANG0.26%0.59%0.26%

Why These ETFs Overlap

Both funds come from IShares. IWR is a mid-cap U.S. equity ETF, while QUAL is an equity ETF. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are FAST, MPWR, and GWW, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both IWR and QUAL can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions About IWR and QUAL

What is the overlap between IWR and QUAL?+
IWR and QUAL currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 9.5% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do IWR and QUAL share?+
They share 58 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the IWR and QUAL overlap high?+
The current verdict is Low Overlap. That means the two ETFs have limited duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do IWR and QUAL overlap?+
IWR and QUAL overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 12.34% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, IWR or QUAL?+
IWR and QUAL look closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche pair, so the main difference is more about strategy and weighting than simple market coverage.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/IWR-QUAL.