IWR vs SCHG Overlap
IWR is a mid-cap U.S. equity ETF from IShares, while SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab. IWR and SCHG show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 10.71%. They share 121 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by VRT, PWR, and HLT.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
IWR is a mid-cap U.S. equity ETF from IShares, while SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab. IWR and SCHG show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 10.71%. They share 121 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by VRT, PWR, and HLT.
- 10.71% weighted overlap across 121 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 9.08% of the measured overlap.
- SCHG is the broader fund, while IWR is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- IWR holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- SCHG holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
IWR is a mid-cap U.S. equity ETF from IShares, while SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab. IWR and SCHG do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like VRT, PWR, and HLT.
How They Differ
IWR is a mid-cap U.S. equity ETF from IShares, while SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab. SCHG is the broader fund, while IWR is the more targeted sleeve. SCHG has the lower expense ratio, while IWR charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 9.08% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, SCHG is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, IWR is the narrower expression. SCHG has the lower expense ratio, while IWR charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 9.08% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between IWR and SCHG.
| Holding | Name | IWR Wt. | SCHG Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VRT | VERTIV HOLDINGS CLASS A | 0.80% | 0.39% | 0.39% |
| PWR | QUANTA SERVICES INC | 0.65% | 0.32% | 0.32% |
| HLT | HILTON WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS INC | 0.53% | 0.26% | 0.26% |
| NET | CLOUDFLARE INC CLASS A | 0.51% | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| PSX | PHILLIPS | 0.51% | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| HOOD | ROBINHOOD MARKETS INC CLASS A | 0.45% | 0.23% | 0.23% |
| BKR | BAKER HUGHES CLASS A | 0.46% | 0.22% | 0.22% |
| MPWR | MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC | 0.38% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
| TRGP | TARGA RESOURCES CORP | 0.38% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
| URI | UNITED RENTALS INC | 0.38% | 0.19% | 0.19% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
IWR is a mid-cap U.S. equity ETF from IShares, while SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are VRT, PWR, and HLT, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both IWR and SCHG can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About IWR and SCHG
What is the overlap between IWR and SCHG?+
How many holdings do IWR and SCHG share?+
Is the IWR and SCHG overlap high?+
Why do IWR and SCHG overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, IWR or SCHG?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.