JEPI vs MTUM Overlap

JEPI is an equity ETF from J.P. Morgan, while MTUM is an equity ETF from IShares. JEPI and MTUM show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 15.95%. They share 17 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by JNJ, RTX, and NVDA.

15.9% overlap
#
17Shared Holdings
OK
Low Overlap

Served from cache.

Quick Answer

JEPI is an equity ETF from J.P. Morgan, while MTUM is an equity ETF from IShares. JEPI and MTUM show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 15.95%. They share 17 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by JNJ, RTX, and NVDA.

  • 15.95% weighted overlap across 17 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 30.08% of the measured overlap.
  • JEPI and MTUM are closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche ETF pair.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both can still add materially different exposure.

Data Freshness

JEPI holdings
Mar 12, 2026
MTUM holdings
Mar 12, 2026
Overlap computed
Mar 15, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

About These ETFs

ETF A

JEPI

JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF

Issuer
J.P. Morgan
Asset class
US Equity
Expense ratio
0.35%
AUM
$44B
Inception
May 20, 2020

ETF B

MTUM

iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.15%
AUM
$21B
Inception
Apr 16, 2013

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

JEPI is an equity ETF from J.P. Morgan, while MTUM is an equity ETF from IShares. JEPI and MTUM do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like JNJ, RTX, and NVDA.

02

How They Differ

JEPI is an equity ETF from J.P. Morgan, while MTUM is an equity ETF from IShares. Neither fund clearly dominates on breadth, so the practical difference is more about weighting, index construction, and cost. MTUM has the lower expense ratio, while JEPI charges more for its exposure.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 30.08% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

Because JEPI and MTUM are closer in breadth, the better fit usually comes down to index methodology, issuer preference, and cost. MTUM has the lower expense ratio, while JEPI charges more for its exposure.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 30.08% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between JEPI and MTUM.

HoldingJEPI Wt.MTUM Wt.Overlap
JNJ1.75%4.55%1.75%
RTX1.58%1.97%1.58%
NVDA1.46%4.91%1.46%
GOOGL1.44%2.69%1.44%
AVGO1.41%5.07%1.41%
WMT1.41%2.99%1.41%
APH1.23%1.65%1.23%
HWM1.71%1.14%1.14%
ADI1.51%0.92%0.92%
XOM0.78%3.77%0.78%

Why These ETFs Overlap

JEPI is an equity ETF from J.P. Morgan, while MTUM is an equity ETF from IShares. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are JNJ, RTX, and NVDA, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both JEPI and MTUM can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions About JEPI and MTUM

What is the overlap between JEPI and MTUM?+
JEPI and MTUM currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 15.95% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do JEPI and MTUM share?+
They share 17 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the JEPI and MTUM overlap high?+
The current verdict is Low Overlap. That means the two ETFs have limited duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do JEPI and MTUM overlap?+
JEPI and MTUM overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 30.08% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, JEPI or MTUM?+
JEPI and MTUM look closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche pair, so the main difference is more about strategy and weighting than simple market coverage.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/JEPI-MTUM.