JEPI vs XLRE Overlap
JEPI is an equity ETF from J.P. Morgan, while XLRE is a real estate ETF from SPDR. JEPI and XLRE show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 3%. They share 5 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by EQIX, WELL, and VTR.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
JEPI is an equity ETF from J.P. Morgan, while XLRE is a real estate ETF from SPDR. JEPI and XLRE show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 3%. They share 5 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by EQIX, WELL, and VTR.
- 3% weighted overlap across 5 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 74.8% of the measured overlap.
- JEPI is the broader fund, while XLRE is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- JEPI holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- XLRE holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
JEPI is an equity ETF from J.P. Morgan, while XLRE is a real estate ETF from SPDR. JEPI and XLRE do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like EQIX, WELL, and VTR.
How They Differ
JEPI is an equity ETF from J.P. Morgan, while XLRE is a real estate ETF from SPDR. JEPI is the broader fund, while XLRE is the more targeted sleeve. XLRE has the lower expense ratio, while JEPI charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 74.8% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, JEPI is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, XLRE is the narrower expression. XLRE has the lower expense ratio, while JEPI charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 74.8% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between JEPI and XLRE.
| Holding | Name | JEPI Wt. | XLRE Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQIX | EQUINIX INC REIT USD | 0.92% | 6.96% | 0.92% |
| WELL | WELLTOWER INC | 0.72% | 10.58% | 0.72% |
| VTR | VENTAS INC REIT USD 0.25 | 0.61% | 4.18% | 0.61% |
| SBAC | SBA COMMUNICATIONS CORP | 0.43% | 2.13% | 0.43% |
| AMT | AMERICAN TOWER CORP REIT | 0.32% | 6.46% | 0.32% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
JEPI is an equity ETF from J.P. Morgan, while XLRE is a real estate ETF from SPDR. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are EQIX, WELL, and VTR, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both JEPI and XLRE can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About JEPI and XLRE
What is the overlap between JEPI and XLRE?+
How many holdings do JEPI and XLRE share?+
Is the JEPI and XLRE overlap high?+
Why do JEPI and XLRE overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, JEPI or XLRE?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.