MGK vs MTUM Overlap
MGK is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Vanguard, while MTUM is an equity ETF from IShares. MGK and MTUM show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 23.93%. They share 16 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, AVGO, and GOOGL.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
MGK is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Vanguard, while MTUM is an equity ETF from IShares. MGK and MTUM show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 23.93%. They share 16 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, AVGO, and GOOGL.
- 23.93% weighted overlap across 16 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 48.16% of the measured overlap.
- MGK and MTUM are closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche ETF pair.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both may add less diversification than the fund names imply.
Data Freshness
- MGK holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- MTUM holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
MGK is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Vanguard, while MTUM is an equity ETF from IShares. MGK and MTUM overlap enough to matter, but they still bring different exposures to a portfolio. The overlap is concentrated in holdings such as NVDA, AVGO, and GOOGL, which explains why the score lands at 23.93%.
How They Differ
MGK is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Vanguard, while MTUM is an equity ETF from IShares. Neither fund clearly dominates on breadth, so the practical difference is more about weighting, index construction, and cost. MGK has the lower expense ratio, while MTUM charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 48.16% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
Because MGK and MTUM are closer in breadth, the better fit usually comes down to index methodology, issuer preference, and cost. MGK has the lower expense ratio, while MTUM charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 48.16% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between MGK and MTUM.
| Holding | Name | MGK Wt. | MTUM Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | NVIDIA Corp | 13.52% | 4.91% | 4.91% |
| AVGO | Broadcom Inc | 3.93% | 5.07% | 3.93% |
| GOOGL | Alphabet Inc | 5.85% | 2.69% | 2.69% |
| GOOG | Alphabet Inc | 4.63% | 2.19% | 2.19% |
| AMD | Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.54% | 2.64% | 1.54% |
| LRCX | Lam Research Corp | 1.31% | 3.45% | 1.31% |
| PLTR | Palantir Technologies Inc | 1.25% | 1.89% | 1.25% |
| GEV | GE Vernova Inc | 0.91% | 2.24% | 0.91% |
| KLAC | KLA Corp | 0.89% | 1.52% | 0.89% |
| APH | Amphenol Corp | 0.82% | 1.65% | 0.82% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
MGK is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Vanguard, while MTUM is an equity ETF from IShares. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are NVDA, AVGO, and GOOGL, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both MGK and MTUM can still be reasonable, but you should expect some duplication. The decision comes down to whether the non-overlapping parts of each ETF are important enough for your strategy.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About MGK and MTUM
What is the overlap between MGK and MTUM?+
How many holdings do MGK and MTUM share?+
Is the MGK and MTUM overlap high?+
Why do MGK and MTUM overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, MGK or MTUM?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.