MGK vs SCHV Overlap
MGK is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Vanguard, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab. MGK and SCHV show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 6.51%. They share 14 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by LRCX, ORCL, and TJX.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
MGK is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Vanguard, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab. MGK and SCHV show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 6.51%. They share 14 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by LRCX, ORCL, and TJX.
- 6.51% weighted overlap across 14 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 37.62% of the measured overlap.
- SCHV is the broader fund, while MGK is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- MGK holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- SCHV holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
MGK is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Vanguard, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab. MGK and SCHV do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like LRCX, ORCL, and TJX.
How They Differ
MGK is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Vanguard, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab. SCHV is the broader fund, while MGK is the more targeted sleeve. SCHV has the lower expense ratio, while MGK charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 37.62% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, SCHV is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, MGK is the narrower expression. SCHV has the lower expense ratio, while MGK charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 37.62% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between MGK and SCHV.
| Holding | Name | MGK Wt. | SCHV Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | Lam Research Corp | 1.31% | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| ORCL | Oracle Corp | 1.12% | 0.88% | 0.88% |
| TJX | TJX Cos Inc/The | 0.77% | 0.62% | 0.62% |
| BA | Boeing Co/The | 0.86% | 0.60% | 0.60% |
| MCD | McDonald's Corp | 0.59% | 0.82% | 0.59% |
| APH | Amphenol Corp | 0.82% | 0.59% | 0.59% |
| WELL | Welltower Inc | 0.63% | 0.50% | 0.50% |
| BSX | Boston Scientific Corp | 0.67% | 0.36% | 0.36% |
| AMT | American Tower Corp | 0.35% | 0.30% | 0.30% |
| MRVL | Marvell Technology Inc | 0.28% | 0.28% | 0.28% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
MGK is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Vanguard, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are LRCX, ORCL, and TJX, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both MGK and SCHV can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About MGK and SCHV
What is the overlap between MGK and SCHV?+
How many holdings do MGK and SCHV share?+
Is the MGK and SCHV overlap high?+
Why do MGK and SCHV overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, MGK or SCHV?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.