MGK vs VT Overlap
Both funds come from Vanguard. MGK is a U.S. growth equity ETF, while VT is an equity ETF. MGK and VT show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 27.43%. They share 60 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
Both funds come from Vanguard. MGK is a U.S. growth equity ETF, while VT is an equity ETF. MGK and VT show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 27.43%. They share 60 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT.
- 27.43% weighted overlap across 60 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 38.44% of the measured overlap.
- VT is the broader fund, while MGK is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both may add less diversification than the fund names imply.
Data Freshness
- MGK holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- VT holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
Both funds come from Vanguard. MGK is a U.S. growth equity ETF, while VT is an equity ETF. MGK and VT overlap enough to matter, but they still bring different exposures to a portfolio. The overlap is concentrated in holdings such as NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, which explains why the score lands at 27.43%.
How They Differ
Both funds come from Vanguard. MGK is a U.S. growth equity ETF, while VT is an equity ETF. VT is the broader fund, while MGK is the more targeted sleeve. MGK and VT are priced very similarly on expense ratio.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 38.44% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, VT is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, MGK is the narrower expression. MGK and VT are priced very similarly on expense ratio.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 38.44% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between MGK and VT.
| Holding | Name | MGK Wt. | VT Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | NVIDIA Corp | 13.52% | 4.12% | 4.12% |
| AAPL | Apple Inc | 11.72% | 3.48% | 3.48% |
| MSFT | Microsoft Corp | 9.61% | 2.94% | 2.94% |
| AMZN | Amazon.com Inc | 4.82% | 2.12% | 2.12% |
| GOOGL | Alphabet Inc | 5.85% | 1.82% | 1.82% |
| GOOG | Alphabet Inc | 4.63% | 1.47% | 1.47% |
| META | Meta Platforms Inc | 4.92% | 1.44% | 1.44% |
| AVGO | Broadcom Inc | 3.93% | 1.41% | 1.41% |
| TSLA | Tesla Inc | 4.35% | 1.12% | 1.12% |
| LLY | Eli Lilly & Co | 3.22% | 0.77% | 0.77% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
Both funds come from Vanguard. MGK is a U.S. growth equity ETF, while VT is an equity ETF. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both MGK and VT can still be reasonable, but you should expect some duplication. The decision comes down to whether the non-overlapping parts of each ETF are important enough for your strategy.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About MGK and VT
What is the overlap between MGK and VT?+
How many holdings do MGK and VT share?+
Is the MGK and VT overlap high?+
Why do MGK and VT overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, MGK or VT?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.