MTUM vs QUAL Overlap
Both funds come from IShares. MTUM is an equity ETF, while QUAL is an equity ETF. MTUM and QUAL show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 26.54%. They share 28 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, LRCX, and AMAT.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
Both funds come from IShares. MTUM is an equity ETF, while QUAL is an equity ETF. MTUM and QUAL show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 26.54%. They share 28 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, LRCX, and AMAT.
- 26.54% weighted overlap across 28 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 37.36% of the measured overlap.
- MTUM and QUAL are closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche ETF pair.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both may add less diversification than the fund names imply.
Data Freshness
- MTUM holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- QUAL holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
Both funds come from IShares. MTUM is an equity ETF, while QUAL is an equity ETF. MTUM and QUAL overlap enough to matter, but they still bring different exposures to a portfolio. The overlap is concentrated in holdings such as NVDA, LRCX, and AMAT, which explains why the score lands at 26.54%.
How They Differ
Both funds come from IShares. MTUM is an equity ETF, while QUAL is an equity ETF. Neither fund clearly dominates on breadth, so the practical difference is more about weighting, index construction, and cost. MTUM and QUAL are priced very similarly on expense ratio.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 37.36% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
Because MTUM and QUAL are closer in breadth, the better fit usually comes down to index methodology, issuer preference, and cost. MTUM and QUAL are priced very similarly on expense ratio.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 37.36% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between MTUM and QUAL.
| Holding | Name | MTUM Wt. | QUAL Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | NVIDIA CORP | 4.91% | 6.23% | 4.91% |
| LRCX | LAM RESEARCH CORP | 3.45% | 2.79% | 2.79% |
| AMAT | APPLIED MATERIAL INC | 2.36% | 2.22% | 2.22% |
| JNJ | JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 4.55% | 2.11% | 2.11% |
| CAT | CATERPILLAR INC | 2.95% | 2.10% | 2.10% |
| GOOGL | ALPHABET INC CLASS A | 2.69% | 2.09% | 2.09% |
| GOOG | ALPHABET INC CLASS C | 2.19% | 1.76% | 1.76% |
| KLAC | KLA CORP | 1.52% | 2.39% | 1.52% |
| WMT | WALMART INC | 2.99% | 1.21% | 1.21% |
| LMT | LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP | 1.08% | 1.14% | 1.08% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
Both funds come from IShares. MTUM is an equity ETF, while QUAL is an equity ETF. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are NVDA, LRCX, and AMAT, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both MTUM and QUAL can still be reasonable, but you should expect some duplication. The decision comes down to whether the non-overlapping parts of each ETF are important enough for your strategy.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About MTUM and QUAL
What is the overlap between MTUM and QUAL?+
How many holdings do MTUM and QUAL share?+
Is the MTUM and QUAL overlap high?+
Why do MTUM and QUAL overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, MTUM or QUAL?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.