QQQ vs XLY Overlap
QQQ is an equity ETF from Invesco, while XLY is a consumer discretionary ETF from SPDR. QQQ and XLY show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 11.68%. They share 9 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by AMZN, TSLA, and BKNG.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
QQQ is an equity ETF from Invesco, while XLY is a consumer discretionary ETF from SPDR. QQQ and XLY show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 11.68%. They share 9 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by AMZN, TSLA, and BKNG.
- 11.68% weighted overlap across 9 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 78.02% of the measured overlap.
- QQQ is the broader fund, while XLY is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- QQQ holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- XLY holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 13, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
QQQ is an equity ETF from Invesco, while XLY is a consumer discretionary ETF from SPDR. QQQ and XLY do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like AMZN, TSLA, and BKNG.
How They Differ
QQQ is an equity ETF from Invesco, while XLY is a consumer discretionary ETF from SPDR. QQQ is the broader fund, while XLY is the more targeted sleeve. XLY has the lower expense ratio, while QQQ charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 78.02% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, QQQ is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, XLY is the narrower expression. XLY has the lower expense ratio, while QQQ charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 78.02% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between QQQ and XLY.
| Holding | Name | QQQ Wt. | XLY Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | Amazon.com Inc | 4.47% | 22.24% | 4.47% |
| TSLA | Tesla Inc | 3.89% | 19.23% | 3.89% |
| BKNG | Booking Holdings Inc | 0.76% | 3.38% | 0.76% |
| SBUX | Starbucks Corp | 0.62% | 2.75% | 0.62% |
| MAR | Marriott International Inc/MD | 0.47% | 1.74% | 0.47% |
| ORLY | O'Reilly Automotive Inc | 0.43% | 1.92% | 0.43% |
| ROST | Ross Stores Inc | 0.37% | 1.66% | 0.37% |
| DASH | DoorDash Inc | 0.37% | 1.52% | 0.37% |
| ABNB | Airbnb Inc | 0.30% | 1.35% | 0.30% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
QQQ is an equity ETF from Invesco, while XLY is a consumer discretionary ETF from SPDR. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are AMZN, TSLA, and BKNG, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both QQQ and XLY can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About QQQ and XLY
What is the overlap between QQQ and XLY?+
How many holdings do QQQ and XLY share?+
Is the QQQ and XLY overlap high?+
Why do QQQ and XLY overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, QQQ or XLY?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.