QQQM vs SMH Overlap

QQQM is an equity ETF from Invesco, while SMH is a semiconductor-focused equity ETF from VanEck. QQQM and SMH show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 26.56%. They share 18 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, AVGO, and MU.

26.6% overlap
#
18Shared Holdings
OK
Moderate Overlap

Served from cache.

Quick Answer

QQQM is an equity ETF from Invesco, while SMH is a semiconductor-focused equity ETF from VanEck. QQQM and SMH show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 26.56%. They share 18 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, AVGO, and MU.

  • 26.56% weighted overlap across 18 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 54.01% of the measured overlap.
  • QQQM is the broader fund, while SMH is more targeted.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both may add less diversification than the fund names imply.

Data Freshness

QQQM holdings
Mar 12, 2026
SMH holdings
Mar 12, 2026
Overlap computed
Mar 15, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

About These ETFs

ETF A

QQQM

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

Issuer
Invesco
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.15%
AUM
$71B
Inception
Oct 13, 2020

ETF B

SMH

VanEck Semiconductor ETF

Issuer
VanEck
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.35%
AUM
$46B
Inception
Dec 20, 2011

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

QQQM is an equity ETF from Invesco, while SMH is a semiconductor-focused equity ETF from VanEck. QQQM and SMH overlap enough to matter, but they still bring different exposures to a portfolio. The overlap is concentrated in holdings such as NVDA, AVGO, and MU, which explains why the score lands at 26.56%.

02

How They Differ

QQQM is an equity ETF from Invesco, while SMH is a semiconductor-focused equity ETF from VanEck. QQQM is the broader fund, while SMH is the more targeted sleeve. QQQM has the lower expense ratio, while SMH charges more for its exposure.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 54.01% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

If you want the broader portfolio building block, QQQM is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, SMH is the narrower expression. QQQM has the lower expense ratio, while SMH charges more for its exposure.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 54.01% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between QQQM and SMH.

HoldingQQQM Wt.SMH Wt.Overlap
NVDA8.75%18.90%8.75%
AVGO3.15%7.56%3.15%
MU2.44%6.47%2.44%
AMD1.78%4.31%1.78%
AMAT1.48%5.32%1.48%
LRCX1.46%5.41%1.46%
INTC1.20%4.85%1.20%
KLAC1.03%4.96%1.03%
TXN0.96%4.60%0.96%
ADI0.84%4.55%0.84%

Why These ETFs Overlap

QQQM is an equity ETF from Invesco, while SMH is a semiconductor-focused equity ETF from VanEck. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are NVDA, AVGO, and MU, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both QQQM and SMH can still be reasonable, but you should expect some duplication. The decision comes down to whether the non-overlapping parts of each ETF are important enough for your strategy.

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions About QQQM and SMH

What is the overlap between QQQM and SMH?+
QQQM and SMH currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 26.56% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do QQQM and SMH share?+
They share 18 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the QQQM and SMH overlap high?+
The current verdict is Moderate Overlap. That means the two ETFs have noticeable duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do QQQM and SMH overlap?+
QQQM and SMH overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 54.01% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, QQQM or SMH?+
QQQM is the broader fund, while SMH is the more targeted sleeve. That does not automatically make one better, but it helps explain why the pair can overlap while still serving different roles.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/QQQM-SMH.