QQQM vs VT Overlap
QQQM is an equity ETF from Invesco, while VT is an equity ETF from Vanguard. QQQM and VT show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 28.7%. They share 97 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
QQQM is an equity ETF from Invesco, while VT is an equity ETF from Vanguard. QQQM and VT show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 28.7%. They share 97 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT.
- 28.7% weighted overlap across 97 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 36.74% of the measured overlap.
- VT is the broader fund, while QQQM is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both may add less diversification than the fund names imply.
Data Freshness
- QQQM holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- VT holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
QQQM is an equity ETF from Invesco, while VT is an equity ETF from Vanguard. QQQM and VT overlap enough to matter, but they still bring different exposures to a portfolio. The overlap is concentrated in holdings such as NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, which explains why the score lands at 28.7%.
How They Differ
QQQM is an equity ETF from Invesco, while VT is an equity ETF from Vanguard. VT is the broader fund, while QQQM is the more targeted sleeve. VT has the lower expense ratio, while QQQM charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 36.74% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, VT is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, QQQM is the narrower expression. VT has the lower expense ratio, while QQQM charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 36.74% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between QQQM and VT.
| Holding | Name | QQQM Wt. | VT Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | NVIDIA Corp | 8.75% | 4.12% | 4.12% |
| AAPL | Apple Inc | 7.51% | 3.48% | 3.48% |
| MSFT | Microsoft Corp | 5.88% | 2.94% | 2.94% |
| AMZN | Amazon.com Inc | 4.47% | 2.12% | 2.12% |
| GOOGL | Alphabet Inc | 3.48% | 1.82% | 1.82% |
| GOOG | Alphabet Inc | 3.23% | 1.47% | 1.47% |
| META | Meta Platforms Inc | 3.74% | 1.44% | 1.44% |
| AVGO | Broadcom Inc | 3.15% | 1.41% | 1.41% |
| TSLA | Tesla Inc | 3.88% | 1.12% | 1.12% |
| WMT | Walmart Inc | 3.29% | 0.48% | 0.48% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
QQQM is an equity ETF from Invesco, while VT is an equity ETF from Vanguard. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are NVDA, AAPL, and MSFT, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both QQQM and VT can still be reasonable, but you should expect some duplication. The decision comes down to whether the non-overlapping parts of each ETF are important enough for your strategy.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About QQQM and VT
What is the overlap between QQQM and VT?+
How many holdings do QQQM and VT share?+
Is the QQQM and VT overlap high?+
Why do QQQM and VT overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, QQQM or VT?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.