RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco, while SCHD is a dividend-focused equity ETF from Schwab. RSP and SCHD show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 8.72%. They share 40 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by LYB, CF, and LMT.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco, while SCHD is a dividend-focused equity ETF from Schwab. RSP and SCHD show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 8.72%. They share 40 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by LYB, CF, and LMT.
Data Freshness
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco, while SCHD is a dividend-focused equity ETF from Schwab. RSP and SCHD do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like LYB, CF, and LMT.
RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco, while SCHD is a dividend-focused equity ETF from Schwab. RSP is the broader fund, while SCHD is the more targeted sleeve. SCHD has the lower expense ratio, while RSP charges more for its exposure.
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 9.62% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
If you want the broader portfolio building block, RSP is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, SCHD is the narrower expression. SCHD has the lower expense ratio, while RSP charges more for its exposure.
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 9.62% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between RSP and SCHD.
| Holding | Name | RSP Wt. | SCHD Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LYB | LyondellBasell Industries NV | 0.28% | 0.63% | 0.28% |
| CF | CF Industries Holdings Inc | 0.28% | 0.64% | 0.28% |
| LMT | Lockheed Martin Corp | 0.27% | 4.92% | 0.27% |
| TGT | Target Corp | 0.25% | 2.03% | 0.25% |
| VZ | Verizon Communications Inc | 0.25% | 4.50% | 0.25% |
| VLO | Valero Energy Corp | 0.24% | 2.45% | 0.24% |
| CVX | Chevron Corp | 0.24% | 4.43% | 0.24% |
| HAL | Halliburton Co | 0.24% | 1.10% | 0.24% |
| HSY | Hershey Co/The | 0.24% | 1.20% | 0.24% |
| APA | APA Corp | 0.24% | 0.42% | 0.24% |
RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco, while SCHD is a dividend-focused equity ETF from Schwab. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are LYB, CF, and LMT, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both RSP and SCHD can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.