RSP vs SCHV Overlap

RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab. RSP and SCHV show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 46.93%. They share 363 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by MU, WDC, and GLW.

46.9% overlap
#
363Shared Holdings
OK
Moderate Overlap

Served from cache.

Quick Answer

RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab. RSP and SCHV show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 46.93%. They share 363 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by MU, WDC, and GLW.

  • 46.93% weighted overlap across 363 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 1.85% of the measured overlap.
  • RSP and SCHV are closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche ETF pair.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both may add less diversification than the fund names imply.

Data Freshness

RSP holdings
Mar 12, 2026
SCHV holdings
Mar 12, 2026
Overlap computed
Mar 15, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

About These ETFs

ETF A

RSP

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF

Issuer
Invesco
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.2%
AUM
$87B
Inception
Apr 24, 2003

ETF B

SCHV

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF

Issuer
Schwab
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.04%
AUM
$15B
Inception
Dec 11, 2009

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab. RSP and SCHV overlap enough to matter, but they still bring different exposures to a portfolio. The overlap is concentrated in holdings such as MU, WDC, and GLW, which explains why the score lands at 46.93%.

02

How They Differ

RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab. Neither fund clearly dominates on breadth, so the practical difference is more about weighting, index construction, and cost. SCHV has the lower expense ratio, while RSP charges more for its exposure.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 1.85% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

Because RSP and SCHV are closer in breadth, the better fit usually comes down to index methodology, issuer preference, and cost. SCHV has the lower expense ratio, while RSP charges more for its exposure.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 1.85% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between RSP and SCHV.

HoldingRSP Wt.SCHV Wt.Overlap
MU0.30%1.58%0.30%
WDC0.29%0.32%0.29%
GLW0.28%0.37%0.28%
LMT0.27%0.46%0.27%
FCX0.26%0.31%0.26%
NOC0.26%0.34%0.26%
HWM0.26%0.36%0.26%
STX0.25%0.29%0.25%
LRCX0.25%0.95%0.25%
FDX0.25%0.27%0.25%

Why These ETFs Overlap

RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are MU, WDC, and GLW, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both RSP and SCHV can still be reasonable, but you should expect some duplication. The decision comes down to whether the non-overlapping parts of each ETF are important enough for your strategy.

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions About RSP and SCHV

What is the overlap between RSP and SCHV?+
RSP and SCHV currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 46.93% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do RSP and SCHV share?+
They share 363 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the RSP and SCHV overlap high?+
The current verdict is Moderate Overlap. That means the two ETFs have noticeable duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do RSP and SCHV overlap?+
RSP and SCHV overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 1.85% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, RSP or SCHV?+
RSP and SCHV look closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche pair, so the main difference is more about strategy and weighting than simple market coverage.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/RSP-SCHV.