RSP vs SPTM Overlap

RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco, while SPTM is an equity ETF from SPDR. RSP and SPTM show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 42.35%. They share 486 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by MU, LRCX, and VZ.

42.4% overlap
#
486Shared Holdings
OK
Moderate Overlap

Served from cache.

Quick Answer

RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco, while SPTM is an equity ETF from SPDR. RSP and SPTM show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 42.35%. They share 486 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by MU, LRCX, and VZ.

  • 42.35% weighted overlap across 486 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 1.88% of the measured overlap.
  • RSP is the broader fund, while SPTM is more targeted.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both may add less diversification than the fund names imply.

Data Freshness

RSP holdings
Mar 12, 2026
SPTM holdings
Mar 12, 2026
Overlap computed
Mar 15, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

About These ETFs

ETF A

RSP

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF

Issuer
Invesco
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.2%
AUM
$87B
Inception
Apr 24, 2003

ETF B

SPTM

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF

Issuer
SPDR
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.03%
AUM
$12B
Inception
Oct 4, 2000

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco, while SPTM is an equity ETF from SPDR. RSP and SPTM overlap enough to matter, but they still bring different exposures to a portfolio. The overlap is concentrated in holdings such as MU, LRCX, and VZ, which explains why the score lands at 42.35%.

02

How They Differ

RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco, while SPTM is an equity ETF from SPDR. RSP is the broader fund, while SPTM is the more targeted sleeve. SPTM has the lower expense ratio, while RSP charges more for its exposure.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 1.88% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

If you want the broader portfolio building block, RSP is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, SPTM is the narrower expression. SPTM has the lower expense ratio, while RSP charges more for its exposure.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 1.88% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between RSP and SPTM.

HoldingRSP Wt.SPTM Wt.Overlap
MU0.30%0.72%0.30%
LRCX0.25%0.43%0.25%
VZ0.25%0.34%0.25%
AMAT0.25%0.43%0.25%
XOM0.24%0.99%0.24%
HON0.24%0.24%0.24%
CVX0.24%0.56%0.24%
GILD0.24%0.29%0.24%
DE0.25%0.24%0.24%
LIN0.24%0.36%0.24%

Why These ETFs Overlap

RSP is an equal-weight U.S. equity ETF from Invesco, while SPTM is an equity ETF from SPDR. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are MU, LRCX, and VZ, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both RSP and SPTM can still be reasonable, but you should expect some duplication. The decision comes down to whether the non-overlapping parts of each ETF are important enough for your strategy.

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions About RSP and SPTM

What is the overlap between RSP and SPTM?+
RSP and SPTM currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 42.35% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do RSP and SPTM share?+
They share 486 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the RSP and SPTM overlap high?+
The current verdict is Moderate Overlap. That means the two ETFs have noticeable duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do RSP and SPTM overlap?+
RSP and SPTM overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 1.88% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, RSP or SPTM?+
RSP is the broader fund, while SPTM is the more targeted sleeve. That does not automatically make one better, but it helps explain why the pair can overlap while still serving different roles.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/RSP-SPTM.