SCHD vs VB Overlap

SCHD is a dividend-focused equity ETF from Schwab, while VB is a small-cap U.S. equity ETF from Vanguard. SCHD and VB show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 3.2%. They share 46 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by EWBC, CF, and FNF.

3.2% overlap
#
46Shared Holdings
OK
Low Overlap

Served from cache.

Quick Answer

SCHD is a dividend-focused equity ETF from Schwab, while VB is a small-cap U.S. equity ETF from Vanguard. SCHD and VB show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 3.2%. They share 46 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by EWBC, CF, and FNF.

  • 3.2% weighted overlap across 46 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 18.38% of the measured overlap.
  • SCHD and VB are closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche ETF pair.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both can still add materially different exposure.

Data Freshness

SCHD holdings
Mar 12, 2026
VB holdings
Mar 12, 2026
Overlap computed
Mar 13, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

About These ETFs

ETF A

SCHD

Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF

Issuer
Schwab
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.06%
AUM
$84B
Inception
Oct 20, 2011

ETF B

VB

Vanguard Small-Cap ETF

Issuer
Vanguard
Asset class
Small/Micro Cap Equity
Expense ratio
0.03%
AUM
$169B
Inception
Jan 26, 2004

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

SCHD is a dividend-focused equity ETF from Schwab, while VB is a small-cap U.S. equity ETF from Vanguard. SCHD and VB do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like EWBC, CF, and FNF.

02

How They Differ

SCHD is a dividend-focused equity ETF from Schwab, while VB is a small-cap U.S. equity ETF from Vanguard. Neither fund clearly dominates on breadth, so the practical difference is more about weighting, index construction, and cost. VB has the lower expense ratio, while SCHD charges more for its exposure.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 18.38% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

Because SCHD and VB are closer in breadth, the better fit usually comes down to index methodology, issuer preference, and cost. VB has the lower expense ratio, while SCHD charges more for its exposure.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 18.38% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between SCHD and VB.

HoldingSCHD Wt.VB Wt.Overlap
EWBC0.55%0.21%0.21%
CF0.64%0.19%0.19%
FNF0.46%0.19%0.19%
WSO0.49%0.18%0.18%
BBY0.47%0.17%0.17%
UNM0.41%0.16%0.16%
OVV0.50%0.15%0.15%
APA0.42%0.12%0.12%
AFG0.33%0.12%0.12%
COLB0.30%0.12%0.12%

Why These ETFs Overlap

SCHD is a dividend-focused equity ETF from Schwab, while VB is a small-cap U.S. equity ETF from Vanguard. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are EWBC, CF, and FNF, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both SCHD and VB can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions About SCHD and VB

What is the overlap between SCHD and VB?+
SCHD and VB currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 3.2% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do SCHD and VB share?+
They share 46 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the SCHD and VB overlap high?+
The current verdict is Low Overlap. That means the two ETFs have limited duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do SCHD and VB overlap?+
SCHD and VB overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 18.38% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, SCHD or VB?+
SCHD and VB look closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche pair, so the main difference is more about strategy and weighting than simple market coverage.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/SCHD-VB.