Both funds come from Schwab. SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF. SCHG and SCHV show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 0.05%. They share 1 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by 857492706.
Freshly computed.
Quick Answer
Both funds come from Schwab. SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF. SCHG and SCHV show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 0.05%. They share 1 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by 857492706.
Data Freshness
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
Both funds come from Schwab. SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF. SCHG and SCHV do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like 857492706.
Both funds come from Schwab. SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF. Neither fund clearly dominates on breadth, so the practical difference is more about weighting, index construction, and cost. SCHG and SCHV are priced very similarly on expense ratio.
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 105% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
Because SCHG and SCHV are closer in breadth, the better fit usually comes down to index methodology, issuer preference, and cost. SCHG and SCHV are priced very similarly on expense ratio.
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 105% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between SCHG and SCHV.
| Holding | Name | SCHG Wt. | SCHV Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 857492706 | State Street Institutional US Government Money Market Fund | 0.05% | 0.14% | 0.05% |
Both funds come from Schwab. SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF, while SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are 857492706, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both SCHG and SCHV can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Go deeper
Portwise gives you full portfolio diagnostics — concentration risk, hidden risk scoring, drawdown analysis, and risk evolution tracking. Free to start.
Stay informed
Portfolio overlap alerts, new comparison data, and investing insights from the CG Corp team. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.