SCHG vs USMV Overlap

SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab, while USMV is an equity ETF from IShares. SCHG and USMV show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 18.25%. They share 58 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by MSFT, NVDA, and MA.

18.3% overlap
#
58Shared Holdings
OK
Low Overlap

Served from cache.

Quick Answer

SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab, while USMV is an equity ETF from IShares. SCHG and USMV show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 18.25%. They share 58 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by MSFT, NVDA, and MA.

  • 18.25% weighted overlap across 58 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 22.93% of the measured overlap.
  • SCHG is the broader fund, while USMV is more targeted.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both can still add materially different exposure.

Data Freshness

SCHG holdings
Mar 12, 2026
USMV holdings
Mar 12, 2026
Overlap computed
Mar 15, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

About These ETFs

ETF A

SCHG

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

Issuer
Schwab
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.04%
AUM
$51B
Inception
Dec 11, 2009

ETF B

USMV

iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.15%
AUM
$23B
Inception
Oct 18, 2011

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab, while USMV is an equity ETF from IShares. SCHG and USMV do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like MSFT, NVDA, and MA.

02

How They Differ

SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab, while USMV is an equity ETF from IShares. SCHG is the broader fund, while USMV is the more targeted sleeve. SCHG has the lower expense ratio, while USMV charges more for its exposure.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 22.93% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

If you want the broader portfolio building block, SCHG is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, USMV is the narrower expression. SCHG has the lower expense ratio, while USMV charges more for its exposure.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 22.93% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between SCHG and USMV.

HoldingSCHG Wt.USMV Wt.Overlap
MSFT7.57%1.53%1.53%
NVDA11.27%1.50%1.50%
MA1.60%1.16%1.16%
V2.01%0.88%0.88%
AAPL9.67%0.78%0.78%
CRM0.70%0.96%0.70%
LLY3.01%0.70%0.70%
PLTR1.31%0.53%0.53%
PANW0.50%0.48%0.48%
INTU0.48%0.80%0.48%

Why These ETFs Overlap

SCHG is a U.S. growth equity ETF from Schwab, while USMV is an equity ETF from IShares. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are MSFT, NVDA, and MA, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both SCHG and USMV can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions About SCHG and USMV

What is the overlap between SCHG and USMV?+
SCHG and USMV currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 18.25% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do SCHG and USMV share?+
They share 58 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the SCHG and USMV overlap high?+
The current verdict is Low Overlap. That means the two ETFs have limited duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do SCHG and USMV overlap?+
SCHG and USMV overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 22.93% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, SCHG or USMV?+
SCHG is the broader fund, while USMV is the more targeted sleeve. That does not automatically make one better, but it helps explain why the pair can overlap while still serving different roles.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/SCHG-USMV.