SCHV vs SPTM Overlap

SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab, while SPTM is an equity ETF from SPDR. SCHV and SPTM show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 43.19%. They share 522 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by JPM, XOM, and JNJ.

43.2% overlap
#
522Shared Holdings
OK
Moderate Overlap

Served from cache.

Quick Answer

SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab, while SPTM is an equity ETF from SPDR. SCHV and SPTM show meaningful overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 43.19%. They share 522 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by JPM, XOM, and JNJ.

  • 43.19% weighted overlap across 522 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 7.34% of the measured overlap.
  • SCHV is the broader fund, while SPTM is more targeted.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both may add less diversification than the fund names imply.

Data Freshness

SCHV holdings
Mar 12, 2026
SPTM holdings
Mar 12, 2026
Overlap computed
Mar 15, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

About These ETFs

ETF A

SCHV

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF

Issuer
Schwab
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.04%
AUM
$15B
Inception
Dec 11, 2009

ETF B

SPTM

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF

Issuer
SPDR
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.03%
AUM
$12B
Inception
Oct 4, 2000

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab, while SPTM is an equity ETF from SPDR. SCHV and SPTM overlap enough to matter, but they still bring different exposures to a portfolio. The overlap is concentrated in holdings such as JPM, XOM, and JNJ, which explains why the score lands at 43.19%.

02

How They Differ

SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab, while SPTM is an equity ETF from SPDR. SCHV is the broader fund, while SPTM is the more targeted sleeve. SPTM has the lower expense ratio, while SCHV charges more for its exposure.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 7.34% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

If you want the broader portfolio building block, SCHV is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, SPTM is the narrower expression. SPTM has the lower expense ratio, while SCHV charges more for its exposure.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 7.34% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between SCHV and SPTM.

HoldingSCHV Wt.SPTM Wt.Overlap
JPM2.75%1.25%1.25%
XOM2.19%0.99%0.99%
JNJ2.06%0.93%0.93%
WMT1.92%0.87%0.87%
MU1.58%0.72%0.72%
ABBV1.41%0.64%0.64%
PG1.28%0.58%0.58%
HD1.25%0.56%0.56%
CVX1.24%0.56%0.56%
CAT1.18%0.54%0.54%

Why These ETFs Overlap

SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab, while SPTM is an equity ETF from SPDR. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are JPM, XOM, and JNJ, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both SCHV and SPTM can still be reasonable, but you should expect some duplication. The decision comes down to whether the non-overlapping parts of each ETF are important enough for your strategy.

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions About SCHV and SPTM

What is the overlap between SCHV and SPTM?+
SCHV and SPTM currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 43.19% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do SCHV and SPTM share?+
They share 522 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the SCHV and SPTM overlap high?+
The current verdict is Moderate Overlap. That means the two ETFs have noticeable duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do SCHV and SPTM overlap?+
SCHV and SPTM overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 7.34% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, SCHV or SPTM?+
SCHV is the broader fund, while SPTM is the more targeted sleeve. That does not automatically make one better, but it helps explain why the pair can overlap while still serving different roles.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/SCHV-SPTM.