SCHV vs XLRE Overlap

SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab, while XLRE is a real estate ETF from SPDR. SCHV and XLRE show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 3.59%. They share 29 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by WELL, PLD, and AMT.

3.6% overlap
#
29Shared Holdings
OK
Low Overlap

Served from cache.

Quick Answer

SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab, while XLRE is a real estate ETF from SPDR. SCHV and XLRE show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 3.59%. They share 29 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by WELL, PLD, and AMT.

  • 3.59% weighted overlap across 29 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 34.74% of the measured overlap.
  • SCHV is the broader fund, while XLRE is more targeted.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both can still add materially different exposure.

Data Freshness

SCHV holdings
Mar 12, 2026
XLRE holdings
Mar 12, 2026
Overlap computed
Mar 15, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

About These ETFs

ETF A

SCHV

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF

Issuer
Schwab
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.04%
AUM
$15B
Inception
Dec 11, 2009

ETF B

XLRE

State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR ETF

Issuer
SPDR
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.08%
AUM
$8B
Inception
Oct 7, 2015

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab, while XLRE is a real estate ETF from SPDR. SCHV and XLRE do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like WELL, PLD, and AMT.

02

How They Differ

SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab, while XLRE is a real estate ETF from SPDR. SCHV is the broader fund, while XLRE is the more targeted sleeve. SCHV has the lower expense ratio, while XLRE charges more for its exposure.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 34.74% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

If you want the broader portfolio building block, SCHV is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, XLRE is the narrower expression. SCHV has the lower expense ratio, while XLRE charges more for its exposure.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 34.74% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between SCHV and XLRE.

HoldingSCHV Wt.XLRE Wt.Overlap
WELL0.50%10.58%0.50%
PLD0.44%9.38%0.44%
AMT0.30%6.46%0.30%
SPG0.22%4.65%0.22%
O0.21%4.85%0.21%
DLR0.20%4.80%0.20%
PSA0.17%4.84%0.17%
VTR0.14%4.18%0.14%
CBRE0.14%3.64%0.14%
CCI0.14%3.99%0.14%

Why These ETFs Overlap

SCHV is a U.S. value equity ETF from Schwab, while XLRE is a real estate ETF from SPDR. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are WELL, PLD, and AMT, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both SCHV and XLRE can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions About SCHV and XLRE

What is the overlap between SCHV and XLRE?+
SCHV and XLRE currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 3.59% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do SCHV and XLRE share?+
They share 29 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the SCHV and XLRE overlap high?+
The current verdict is Low Overlap. That means the two ETFs have limited duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do SCHV and XLRE overlap?+
SCHV and XLRE overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 34.74% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, SCHV or XLRE?+
SCHV is the broader fund, while XLRE is the more targeted sleeve. That does not automatically make one better, but it helps explain why the pair can overlap while still serving different roles.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/SCHV-XLRE.