SPLG vs VWO Overlap
SPLG is a U.S. large-cap core ETF from SPDR, while VWO is an emerging-markets equity ETF from Vanguard. SPLG and VWO show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 0.15%. They share 8 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by KMB, T, and TEL.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
SPLG is a U.S. large-cap core ETF from SPDR, while VWO is an emerging-markets equity ETF from Vanguard. SPLG and VWO show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 0.15%. They share 8 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by KMB, T, and TEL.
- 0.15% weighted overlap across 8 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 71.33% of the measured overlap.
- SPLG is the broader fund, while VWO is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- SPLG holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- VWO holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
SPLG is a U.S. large-cap core ETF from SPDR, while VWO is an emerging-markets equity ETF from Vanguard. SPLG and VWO do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like KMB, T, and TEL.
How They Differ
SPLG is a U.S. large-cap core ETF from SPDR, while VWO is an emerging-markets equity ETF from Vanguard. SPLG is the broader fund, while VWO is the more targeted sleeve. SPLG has the lower expense ratio, while VWO charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 71.33% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, SPLG is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, VWO is the narrower expression. SPLG has the lower expense ratio, while VWO charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 71.33% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between SPLG and VWO.
| Holding | Name | SPLG Wt. | VWO Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KMB | KIMBERLY CLARK CORP | 0.07% | 0.21% | 0.07% |
| T | AT+T INC | 0.31% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| TEL | TE CONNECTIVITY PLC | 0.12% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| PEP | PEPSICO INC | 0.35% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| EL | ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES CL A | 0.04% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| LULU | LULULEMON ATHLETICA INC | 0.03% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| SRE | SEMPRA | 0.10% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| CMS | CMS ENERGY CORP | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
SPLG is a U.S. large-cap core ETF from SPDR, while VWO is an emerging-markets equity ETF from Vanguard. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are KMB, T, and TEL, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both SPLG and VWO can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About SPLG and VWO
What is the overlap between SPLG and VWO?+
How many holdings do SPLG and VWO share?+
Is the SPLG and VWO overlap high?+
Why do SPLG and VWO overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, SPLG or VWO?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.