SPTM vs VB Overlap
SPTM is an equity ETF from SPDR, while VB is a small-cap U.S. equity ETF from Vanguard. SPTM and VB show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 10.29%. They share 980 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by SNDK, LITE, and FIX.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
SPTM is an equity ETF from SPDR, while VB is a small-cap U.S. equity ETF from Vanguard. SPTM and VB show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 10.29%. They share 980 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by SNDK, LITE, and FIX.
- 10.29% weighted overlap across 980 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 2.82% of the measured overlap.
- SPTM and VB are closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche ETF pair.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- SPTM holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- VB holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
SPTM is an equity ETF from SPDR, while VB is a small-cap U.S. equity ETF from Vanguard. SPTM and VB do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like SNDK, LITE, and FIX.
How They Differ
SPTM is an equity ETF from SPDR, while VB is a small-cap U.S. equity ETF from Vanguard. Neither fund clearly dominates on breadth, so the practical difference is more about weighting, index construction, and cost. SPTM and VB are priced very similarly on expense ratio.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 2.82% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
Because SPTM and VB are closer in breadth, the better fit usually comes down to index methodology, issuer preference, and cost. SPTM and VB are priced very similarly on expense ratio.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 2.82% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between SPTM and VB.
| Holding | Name | SPTM Wt. | VB Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNDK | SANDISK CORP | 0.13% | 1.06% | 0.13% |
| LITE | LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC | 0.08% | 0.37% | 0.08% |
| FIX | COMFORT SYSTEMS USA INC | 0.07% | 0.54% | 0.07% |
| TER | TERADYNE INC | 0.07% | 0.25% | 0.07% |
| CIEN | CIENA CORP | 0.07% | 0.47% | 0.07% |
| COHR | COHERENT CORP | 0.07% | 0.44% | 0.07% |
| EQT | EQT CORP | 0.06% | 0.24% | 0.06% |
| EME | EMCOR GROUP INC | 0.06% | 0.43% | 0.06% |
| TPR | TAPESTRY INC | 0.05% | 0.34% | 0.05% |
| NRG | NRG ENERGY INC | 0.05% | 0.39% | 0.05% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
SPTM is an equity ETF from SPDR, while VB is a small-cap U.S. equity ETF from Vanguard. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are SNDK, LITE, and FIX, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both SPTM and VB can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About SPTM and VB
What is the overlap between SPTM and VB?+
How many holdings do SPTM and VB share?+
Is the SPTM and VB overlap high?+
Why do SPTM and VB overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, SPTM or VB?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.