SPTM vs XLE Overlap
Both funds come from SPDR. SPTM is an equity ETF, while XLE is an energy sector ETF. SPTM and XLE show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 3.21%. They share 22 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by XOM, CVX, and COP.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
Both funds come from SPDR. SPTM is an equity ETF, while XLE is an energy sector ETF. SPTM and XLE show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 3.21%. They share 22 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by XOM, CVX, and COP.
- 3.21% weighted overlap across 22 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 55.08% of the measured overlap.
- SPTM is the broader fund, while XLE is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- SPTM holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- XLE holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
Both funds come from SPDR. SPTM is an equity ETF, while XLE is an energy sector ETF. SPTM and XLE do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like XOM, CVX, and COP.
How They Differ
Both funds come from SPDR. SPTM is an equity ETF, while XLE is an energy sector ETF. SPTM is the broader fund, while XLE is the more targeted sleeve. SPTM has the lower expense ratio, while XLE charges more for its exposure.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 55.08% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, SPTM is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, XLE is the narrower expression. SPTM has the lower expense ratio, while XLE charges more for its exposure.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 55.08% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between SPTM and XLE.
| Holding | Name | SPTM Wt. | XLE Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XOM | EXXON MOBIL CORP | 0.99% | 23.52% | 0.99% |
| CVX | CHEVRON CORP | 0.56% | 17.34% | 0.56% |
| COP | CONOCOPHILLIPS | 0.22% | 6.94% | 0.22% |
| WMB | WILLIAMS COS INC | 0.14% | 4.53% | 0.14% |
| EOG | EOG RESOURCES INC | 0.11% | 3.99% | 0.11% |
| SLB | SLB LTD | 0.11% | 4.13% | 0.11% |
| VLO | VALERO ENERGY CORP | 0.11% | 3.80% | 0.11% |
| PSX | PHILLIPS 66 | 0.11% | 3.76% | 0.11% |
| KMI | KINDER MORGAN INC | 0.10% | 3.71% | 0.10% |
| MPC | MARATHON PETROLEUM CORP | 0.10% | 3.72% | 0.10% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
Both funds come from SPDR. SPTM is an equity ETF, while XLE is an energy sector ETF. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are XOM, CVX, and COP, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both SPTM and XLE can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About SPTM and XLE
What is the overlap between SPTM and XLE?+
How many holdings do SPTM and XLE share?+
Is the SPTM and XLE overlap high?+
Why do SPTM and XLE overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, SPTM or XLE?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.