SPTM vs XLV Overlap

Both funds come from SPDR. SPTM is an equity ETF, while XLV is a health care sector ETF. SPTM and XLV show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 8.83%. They share 60 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by LLY, JNJ, and ABBV.

8.8% overlap
#
60Shared Holdings
OK
Low Overlap

Served from cache.

Quick Answer

Both funds come from SPDR. SPTM is an equity ETF, while XLV is a health care sector ETF. SPTM and XLV show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 8.83%. They share 60 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by LLY, JNJ, and ABBV.

  • 8.83% weighted overlap across 60 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 32.04% of the measured overlap.
  • SPTM is the broader fund, while XLV is more targeted.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both can still add materially different exposure.

Data Freshness

SPTM holdings
Mar 12, 2026
XLV holdings
Mar 12, 2026
Overlap computed
Mar 15, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

About These ETFs

ETF A

SPTM

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF

Issuer
SPDR
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.03%
AUM
$12B
Inception
Oct 4, 2000

ETF B

XLV

State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF

Issuer
SPDR
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.08%
AUM
$40B
Inception
Dec 16, 1998

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

Both funds come from SPDR. SPTM is an equity ETF, while XLV is a health care sector ETF. SPTM and XLV do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like LLY, JNJ, and ABBV.

02

How They Differ

Both funds come from SPDR. SPTM is an equity ETF, while XLV is a health care sector ETF. SPTM is the broader fund, while XLV is the more targeted sleeve. SPTM has the lower expense ratio, while XLV charges more for its exposure.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 32.04% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

If you want the broader portfolio building block, SPTM is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, XLV is the narrower expression. SPTM has the lower expense ratio, while XLV charges more for its exposure.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 32.04% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between SPTM and XLV.

HoldingSPTM Wt.XLV Wt.Overlap
LLY1.26%14.35%1.26%
JNJ0.93%10.60%0.93%
ABBV0.64%7.24%0.64%
MRK0.46%5.24%0.46%
UNH0.41%4.62%0.41%
AMGN0.33%3.65%0.33%
ABT0.31%3.47%0.31%
TMO0.30%3.39%0.30%
GILD0.29%3.33%0.29%
ISRG0.27%3.11%0.27%

Why These ETFs Overlap

Both funds come from SPDR. SPTM is an equity ETF, while XLV is a health care sector ETF. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are LLY, JNJ, and ABBV, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both SPTM and XLV can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions About SPTM and XLV

What is the overlap between SPTM and XLV?+
SPTM and XLV currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 8.83% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do SPTM and XLV share?+
They share 60 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the SPTM and XLV overlap high?+
The current verdict is Low Overlap. That means the two ETFs have limited duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do SPTM and XLV overlap?+
SPTM and XLV overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 32.04% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, SPTM or XLV?+
SPTM is the broader fund, while XLV is the more targeted sleeve. That does not automatically make one better, but it helps explain why the pair can overlap while still serving different roles.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/SPTM-XLV.