ETF Overlap Checker
HomeETFsMethodologyBlogCompany

ETF Overlap Checker

Compare ETF holdings and spot redundancy in your portfolio.

ETF directoryMethodologyBlog

Also from CG Corp

Portwise — Portfolio risk researchEarningBird — AI earnings analysisWorldPulse — Global intelligenceTravelGuides — City guide journal

Connect

cgcorp.ioX (@carraway_gatsby)YouTube

Data is for informational purposes only. Not financial advice.

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service© 2026 Carraway & Gatsby Corporation

TLT vs USMV Overlap

Both funds come from IShares. TLT is a fixed-income ETF, while USMV is an equity ETF. TLT and USMV show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 0.18%. They share 1 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by 066922477.

0.2% overlap
#
1Shared Holdings
OK
Low Overlap

Freshly computed.

Quick Answer

Both funds come from IShares. TLT is a fixed-income ETF, while USMV is an equity ETF. TLT and USMV show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 0.18%. They share 1 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by 066922477.

  • 0.18% weighted overlap across 1 shared holdings.
  • The top three shared holdings explain 100.28% of the measured overlap.
  • TLT and USMV are closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche ETF pair.
  • The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
  • Holding both can still add materially different exposure.

Data Freshness

TLT holdings
Jul 19, 2026
USMV holdings
Jul 19, 2026
Overlap computed
Jul 19, 2026
Data source
Financial Modeling Prep

Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.

Compare another pair

vs

Advertisement

About These ETFs

ETF A

TLT

iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Fixed Income
Expense ratio
0.15%
AUM
$43B
Inception
Jul 22, 2002

ETF B

USMV

iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF

Issuer
IShares
Asset class
Equity
Expense ratio
0.15%
AUM
$23B
Inception
Oct 18, 2011

What Stands Out In This Comparison

01

What This Means

Both funds come from IShares. TLT is a fixed-income ETF, while USMV is an equity ETF. TLT and USMV do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like 066922477.

02

How They Differ

Both funds come from IShares. TLT is a fixed-income ETF, while USMV is an equity ETF. Neither fund clearly dominates on breadth, so the practical difference is more about weighting, index construction, and cost. TLT and USMV are priced very similarly on expense ratio.

03

What Drives The Overlap

The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 100.28% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.

04

When One May Fit Better

Because TLT and USMV are closer in breadth, the better fit usually comes down to index methodology, issuer preference, and cost. TLT and USMV are priced very similarly on expense ratio.

Overlap Driver Snapshot

Concentration

The top three shared holdings explain 100.28% of the full overlap score.

That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.

Shared Sector Tilt

Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.

Top Shared Holdings

These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between TLT and USMV.

HoldingNameTLT Wt.USMV Wt.Overlap
066922477BlackRock Funds III1.15%0.18%0.18%

Why These ETFs Overlap

Both funds come from IShares. TLT is a fixed-income ETF, while USMV is an equity ETF. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are 066922477, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.

Holding both TLT and USMV can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.

Related Comparisons

AGG vs TLT->AGG vs USMV->BND vs TLT->BND vs USMV->

Frequently Asked Questions About TLT and USMV

What is the overlap between TLT and USMV?+
TLT and USMV currently show an estimated weighted overlap of 0.18% based on the loaded holdings data.
How many holdings do TLT and USMV share?+
They share 1 holdings in the current dataset.
Is the TLT and USMV overlap high?+
The current verdict is Low Overlap. That means the two ETFs have limited duplication in portfolio weight.
Why do TLT and USMV overlap?+
TLT and USMV overlap because the same large positions appear in both funds. In this comparison, the top three shared holdings explain 100.28% of the measured overlap score.
Which ETF is broader, TLT or USMV?+
TLT and USMV look closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche pair, so the main difference is more about strategy and weighting than simple market coverage.

Go deeper

ETF overlap is just the start

Portwise gives you full portfolio diagnostics — concentration risk, hidden risk scoring, drawdown analysis, and risk evolution tracking. Free to start.

Try Portwise free →

Stay informed

Get ETF insights delivered to your inbox

Portfolio overlap alerts, new comparison data, and investing insights from the CG Corp team. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

How Overlap Is Calculated

A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.

Overlap = sum(min(Weight_A, Weight_B)) for each shared holding

For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.

Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.

Looking for another pair? Start from the homepage or open the canonical URL for this comparison at /compare/TLT-USMV.