VB vs VEA Overlap
Both funds come from Vanguard. VB is a small-cap U.S. equity ETF, while VEA is an equity ETF. VB and VEA show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 0.1%. They share 6 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by ST, SCI, and SATS.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
Both funds come from Vanguard. VB is a small-cap U.S. equity ETF, while VEA is an equity ETF. VB and VEA show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 0.1%. They share 6 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by ST, SCI, and SATS.
- 0.1% weighted overlap across 6 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 90% of the measured overlap.
- VB and VEA are closer in breadth than a broad-vs-niche ETF pair.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- VB holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- VEA holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
Both funds come from Vanguard. VB is a small-cap U.S. equity ETF, while VEA is an equity ETF. VB and VEA do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like ST, SCI, and SATS.
How They Differ
Both funds come from Vanguard. VB is a small-cap U.S. equity ETF, while VEA is an equity ETF. Neither fund clearly dominates on breadth, so the practical difference is more about weighting, index construction, and cost. VB and VEA are priced very similarly on expense ratio.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 90% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
Because VB and VEA are closer in breadth, the better fit usually comes down to index methodology, issuer preference, and cost. VB and VEA are priced very similarly on expense ratio.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 90% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between VB and VEA.
| Holding | Name | VB Wt. | VEA Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ST | Sensata Technologies Holding PLC | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.07% |
| SCI | Service Corp International/US | 0.14% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| SATS | EchoStar Corp | 0.20% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| SON | Sonoco Products Co | 0.06% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| FR | First Industrial Realty Trust Inc | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| SEM | Select Medical Holdings Corp | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
Both funds come from Vanguard. VB is a small-cap U.S. equity ETF, while VEA is an equity ETF. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are ST, SCI, and SATS, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both VB and VEA can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About VB and VEA
What is the overlap between VB and VEA?+
How many holdings do VB and VEA share?+
Is the VB and VEA overlap high?+
Why do VB and VEA overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, VB or VEA?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.