VBR vs VT Overlap
Both funds come from Vanguard. VBR is a U.S. value equity ETF, while VT is an equity ETF. VBR and VT show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 4.2%. They share 699 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by SNDK, TER, and EME.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
Both funds come from Vanguard. VBR is a U.S. value equity ETF, while VT is an equity ETF. VBR and VT show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 4.2%. They share 699 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by SNDK, TER, and EME.
- 4.2% weighted overlap across 699 shared holdings.
- The top three shared holdings explain 3.26% of the measured overlap.
- VT is the broader fund, while VBR is more targeted.
- The overlap is mostly explained by the top shared positions rather than sector labels alone.
- Holding both can still add materially different exposure.
Data Freshness
- VBR holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- VT holdings
- Mar 12, 2026
- Overlap computed
- Mar 15, 2026
- Data source
- Financial Modeling Prep
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
About These ETFs
What Stands Out In This Comparison
What This Means
Both funds come from Vanguard. VBR is a U.S. value equity ETF, while VT is an equity ETF. VBR and VT do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like SNDK, TER, and EME.
How They Differ
Both funds come from Vanguard. VBR is a U.S. value equity ETF, while VT is an equity ETF. VT is the broader fund, while VBR is the more targeted sleeve. VBR and VT are priced very similarly on expense ratio.
What Drives The Overlap
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 3.26% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
When One May Fit Better
If you want the broader portfolio building block, VT is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, VBR is the narrower expression. VBR and VT are priced very similarly on expense ratio.
Overlap Driver Snapshot
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 3.26% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
Top Shared Holdings
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between VBR and VT.
| Holding | Name | VBR Wt. | VT Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNDK | SANDISK CORP | 0.93% | 0.07% | 0.07% |
| TER | Teradyne Inc | 0.22% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
| EME | EMCOR Group Inc | 0.75% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| ST | Sensata Technologies Holding PLC | 0.12% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| NRG | NRG Energy Inc | 0.68% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| HUBB | Hubbell Inc | 0.30% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| TPR | Tapestry Inc | 0.60% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
| ATO | Atmos Energy Corp | 0.63% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| EXE | Expand Energy Corp | 0.29% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
| JBL | Jabil Inc | 0.56% | 0.02% | 0.02% |
Why These ETFs Overlap
Both funds come from Vanguard. VBR is a U.S. value equity ETF, while VT is an equity ETF. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are SNDK, TER, and EME, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both VBR and VT can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Related Comparisons
Frequently Asked Questions About VBR and VT
What is the overlap between VBR and VT?+
How many holdings do VBR and VT share?+
Is the VBR and VT overlap high?+
Why do VBR and VT overlap?+
Which ETF is broader, VBR or VT?+
How Overlap Is Calculated
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.