Both funds come from Vanguard. VGT is a technology-focused equity ETF, while VYM is a dividend-focused equity ETF. VGT and VYM show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 12.81%. They share 30 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by AVGO, CSCO, and ORCL.
Served from cache.
Quick Answer
Both funds come from Vanguard. VGT is a technology-focused equity ETF, while VYM is a dividend-focused equity ETF. VGT and VYM show limited overlap, with an estimated weighted overlap of 12.81%. They share 30 holdings in the loaded dataset, led by AVGO, CSCO, and ORCL.
Data Freshness
Review the methodology for the overlap formula and refresh policy.
Compare another pair
Both funds come from Vanguard. VGT is a technology-focused equity ETF, while VYM is a dividend-focused equity ETF. VGT and VYM do not own much of the same portfolio weight. That usually means you are combining different parts of the market, with only a small amount of duplication through names like AVGO, CSCO, and ORCL.
Both funds come from Vanguard. VGT is a technology-focused equity ETF, while VYM is a dividend-focused equity ETF. VYM is the broader fund, while VGT is the more targeted sleeve. VYM has the lower expense ratio, while VGT charges more for its exposure.
The overlap is driven by a relatively small set of large shared positions. The top three shared holdings account for 53.51% of the score, which means the result is heavily influenced by the biggest common weights rather than a long tail of tiny positions.
If you want the broader portfolio building block, VYM is usually the wider choice. If you want the more focused tilt, VGT is the narrower expression. VYM has the lower expense ratio, while VGT charges more for its exposure.
Concentration
The top three shared holdings explain 53.51% of the full overlap score.
That helps show whether the score comes from a handful of giant shared positions or from a broader mix of common holdings.
Shared Sector Tilt
Sector tags are not consistently available for the biggest shared positions in this dataset, so this comparison leans more on the specific holdings than on sector labels.
These are the holdings contributing the most to the overlap score between VGT and VYM.
| Holding | Name | VGT Wt. | VYM Wt. | Overlap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVGO | Broadcom Inc | 4.21% | 8.03% | 4.21% |
| CSCO | Cisco Systems Inc | 1.85% | 1.52% | 1.52% |
| ORCL | Oracle Corp | 1.45% | 1.13% | 1.13% |
| TXN | Texas Instruments Inc | 1.11% | 1.06% | 1.06% |
| IBM | International Business Machines Corp | 1.08% | 0.89% | 0.89% |
| ADI | Analog Devices Inc | 0.82% | 0.82% | 0.82% |
| QCOM | QUALCOMM Inc | 1.09% | 0.80% | 0.80% |
| ACN | Accenture PLC | 0.47% | 0.46% | 0.46% |
| NXPI | NXP Semiconductors NV | 0.38% | 0.31% | 0.31% |
| DELL | Dell Technologies Inc | 0.61% | 0.27% | 0.27% |
Both funds come from Vanguard. VGT is a technology-focused equity ETF, while VYM is a dividend-focused equity ETF. The overlap exists because both funds allocate meaningful weight to the same holdings. In this dataset, the biggest shared drivers are AVGO, CSCO, and ORCL, which appear in both portfolios and push the overlap score higher.
Holding both VGT and VYM can make sense if you want exposure to different sleeves of the market. The overlap is small enough that both funds may still improve diversification.
Go deeper
Portwise gives you full portfolio diagnostics — concentration risk, hidden risk scoring, drawdown analysis, and risk evolution tracking. Free to start.
Stay informed
Portfolio overlap alerts, new comparison data, and investing insights from the CG Corp team. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
A straightforward approach used by portfolio analysts.
For every stock that appears in both ETFs, we take the smaller of the two weights. Adding up all those minimums gives the total overlap percentage. A score of 100% means the two ETFs hold the exact same stocks in the same proportions.
Want the full explanation? Read the methodology page.